search for: b2186b39

...so, I've noticed that a some transformations on Loads/Stores don't preserve either volatility or alignment information. -- Christopher Lamb -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070402/b2186b39/attachment.html>

On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Christopher Lamb wrote: > Here's a related question. It seems that there might be a benefit in knowing > about two alignment values for a load/store. The alignment of the load/store > itself, but potentially also the alignment of the base pointer used for the > load/store. Having an alignment attribute on pointer types would solve both > these issues, but