search for: b1f289a5

> I think we all agree that blindly allowing the linker to honor the options > would be scary. I agree that we should whitelist the options, and am of the > opinion that we should force validation on the linker side (use of any > option which the linker doesn't support in this form can be fatal). > Starting small is the best way, with `-l` and `-L` as a starting point. I >

..._________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180107/b1f289a5/attachment.html>

> On Jan 6, 2018, at 6:55 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org <mailto:compnerd at compnerd.org>> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:30 AM Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com <mailto:ruiu at google.com>> wrote: > Thank you for starting the discussion thread. >