Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "b120".
Did you mean:
120
2005 Dec 08
2
new dell B120 laptop
I am installing 4.2 on the new dell $499 B120 laptop.
Centos installs just fine. however, when rebooting
it is starting udev and then says Disabling IRQ#11 and stops.
Any ideas on why that would be??
THanks,
Jerry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/at...
2005 Dec 08
0
new dell B120 laptop and ehci_hcd
>/Jerry Geis wrote:
/>// I am installing 4.2 on the new dell $499 B120 laptop.
//>/ Centos installs just fine. however, when rebooting
/>/ it is starting udev and then says Disabling IRQ#11 and stops.
/>/
/>/ Any ideas on why that would be??
/>/
/
>/Do you have a USB devices plugged in? I reinstalled CentOS 4.2 on my
/>/laptop this past weekend...
2009 Aug 04
2
flowadm -i 1 - shows only first flow
...seconds, at which statistics should be displayed. If
> this option is not specified, statistics are
> displayed once.
Which rather suggest it will display statistics for all flows and not
only first one.
Looking at the code of flowadm.c from b120:
flow_stats()
[...]
> /*
> * If an interval is specified, continuously show the stats
> * for only the first flow.
> */
> state->fs_firstonly = (interval != 0);
Is there a reason why only first flow is displayed?
If one wants stats for...
2009 Aug 25
41
snv_110 -> snv_121 produces checksum errors on Raid-Z pool
I have a 5-500GB disk Raid-Z pool that has been producing checksum errors right after upgrading SXCE to build 121. They seem to be randomly occurring on all 5 disks, so it doesn''t look like a disk failure situation.
Repeatingly running a scrub on the pools randomly repairs between 20 and a few hundred checksum errors.
Since I hadn''t physically touched the machine, it seems a
2013 Dec 12
3
Puppetlabs-firewall and Logging
We''re testing out the Puppetlabs-Firewall module. And it seems I''m either
missing something fundamental or Logging/Accpet works/doesn''t work in an
irregular way. I would be most grateful for some input.
*COMMON:*
firewall { ''002 accept related established rules INPUT'': proto => ''all'',
state =>