Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "b1155218".
2011 Jul 29
1
[LLVMdev] Is using lots of in-register values in IR bad?
...gen, then. Because at the
moment I'm only using x86 anyway and in the future I may want to delay the
code generation to install time.
Thanks,
Erkki
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110729/b1155218/attachment.html>
2011 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] Is using lots of in-register values in IR bad?
Erkki Lindpere <villane at gmail.com> writes:
> I want to experiment with avoiding mutable state as far as I can. At
> the moment there are no mutable variables -- only immutable value
> types (numerics, bool, vectors, tuples) and I've been doing everything
> in LLVM registers. The compiler doesn't generate a single alloca, load
> or store at the moment.
Ok. Do you
2011 Jul 28
4
[LLVMdev] Is using lots of in-register values in IR bad?
Hi,
I'm a newbie when it comes to compilers (and even close-to-machine coding),
but recently started working on my own language and am using LLVM as the
mid/backend. Currently I'm generating .ll files from a front-end written in
Scala. The language is not really serious, just a way to learn more about
compilers (and LLVM) and maybe serve as a base for further experiments. It's