search for: b111

...levant part of log.smbd [2003/09/06 11:18:36, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(460) Entry found for user: tilo [2003/09/06 11:18:36, 2] [2003/09/06 11:18:36, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(302) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [tilo] -> [tilo] -> [tilo] succeeded b111-pc16 (192.168.83.16) connect to service profile initially as user tilo (uid=1546, gid=106) (pid 17106) [2003/09/06 11:18:36, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(250) tilo opened file Win2K/NTUSER.DAT read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) [2003/09/06 11:18:36, 2] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1068) smbldap_se...

HI, Dear R community, I have a large data set names dd.txt, the columns are: there are 2402 variables. a1, b1, ..z1, a11, b11, ...z11, a111, b111, ..z111.. IF I dont know the relative position of the columns, but I know I need the following variables: var<-c(a1, c1,a11,b11,f111) Can I use read.columns to read the data into R? I have tried the following codes, but it does not work hh<-read.columns("/house/homedirs/c/cdu/operon/...

...Int rKB/s wKB/s rPk/s wPk/s rAvs wAvs %Util Sat 04:35:38 xvm15_0 146.6 5.32 102.0 73.65 1471.3 74.00 62.21 0.00 04:35:43 xvm15_0 161.6 5.92 112.0 82.24 1477.4 73.68 68.60 0.00 What is the expected accuracy of the bandwidth limiting? I''m using b111. thanks john

...Int rKB/s wKB/s rPk/s wPk/s rAvs wAvs %Util Sat 04:35:38 xvm15_0 146.6 5.32 102.0 73.65 1471.3 74.00 62.21 0.00 04:35:43 xvm15_0 161.6 5.92 112.0 82.24 1477.4 73.68 68.60 0.00 What is the expected accuracy of the bandwidth limiting? I''m using b111. thanks john

Hello, I have setup an Asterisk 1.2.7.1 system, with a working voicemail box: /etc/asterisk/extensions.conf exten => 83086921,1,Answer exten => 83086921,2,Dial(SIP/stefan,5,r) exten => 83086921,3,VoiceMail,u111 exten => 83086921,4,Hangup exten => 83086921,103,VoiceMail,b111 exten => 83086921,104,Hangup /etc/asterisk/voicemail.conf [default] language=de 111 => 111,Mailbox 111,s.guenther@in-put.de The mailbox starts, I hear the intro and speak my message. In the CLI I can see that the message has been recorded and I get the recorded message via mail. But...

Hello, I have setup an Asterisk 1.2.7.1 system, with a working voicemail box: /etc/asterisk/extensions.conf exten => 83086921,1,Answer exten => 83086921,2,Dial(SIP/stefan,5,r) exten => 83086921,3,VoiceMail,u111 exten => 83086921,4,Hangup exten => 83086921,103,VoiceMail,b111 exten => 83086921,104,Hangup /etc/asterisk/voicemail.conf [default] language=de 111 => 111,Mailbox 111,s.guenther@in-put.de The mailbox starts, I hear the intro and speak my message. In the CLI I can see that the message has been recorded and I get the recorded message via mail. But...

Can I send a zfs send stream (ZFS pool version 22 ; ZFS filesystem version 4) to a zfs receive stream on Solaris 10 (ZFS pool version 15 ; ZFS filesystem version 4)? -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D + http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u7 5/09 | OpenSolaris 2010.03 b131 + All that''s really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)

Hello, Experts. I''ve got a problem. I''m trying to expand my main zpool (rpool), but don''t know how to do that. (i''m 100% newbie in non-windows world) I use Osol under Vmware on Windows. I had a pretty small vhdd -> only 12gb. Yesterday i decided to expand my virtual drive to 20gb. (After several tries to upgrade the OS to a newest dev-releases and

I have a filer running Opensolaris (snv_111b) and I am presenting a iSCSI share from a RAIDZ pool. I want to run ZFS on the share at the client. Is it necessary to create a mirror or use ditto blocks at the client to ensure ZFS can recover if it detects a failure at the client? Thanks, Bruin

I have a USB disk with opensolaris200906 installed. I''m using it to test OS on the different boxes. Recently(B109, B110, B111) I run into a weird problem from time to time. ====================================== SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_111 64-bit Copyright 1983-2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Use is subject to license terms. (Can''t load specfs) Press any key to reboot =====================...

Hello, sorry if these questions have been answered before but please excuse me, I''m new to xVM :) Anyway I have been using Linux/Xen for quite a while and am very familiar with it. I am very interesting in changing to OpenSolaris/xVM for the primary reason of being able to easily leverage the ZFS filesystem and thin provisioning for better storage efficiency. 1) Is this ZFS thin

I''m unable to create a centos domU on Opensolaris 2009.6. I had no problem following the instructions to make Solaris a dom0. The same process worked just fine with the GUI virtual machine manager under OpenSUSE 11.1. For a number of reasons I''d prefer to use Opensolaris as my Dom0, but not if it going to be a battle to get everything to work. Is Xen actually a

Hello, I was doing performance testing, validating zvol performance in particularly, and found that zvol write performance to be slow ~35-44MB/s at 1MB blocksize writes. I then tested the underlying zfs file system with the same test and got 121MB/s. Is there any way to fix this? I really would like to have compatible performance between the zfs filesystem and the zfs zvols. # first test is a

...Aug 2014 23:21:14 -0700 From: Pete Cooper <peter_cooper at apple.com> To: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> Cc: LLVM Dev <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Removing static initializers for command line options Message-ID: <272A2B77-7B80-44DE-B111-3DB72BACC63B at apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Pete Cooper <peter_cooper at apple.com> wrote: >> On Aug 19, 20...

...From: Pete Cooper <peter_cooper at apple.com> > To: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > Cc: LLVM Dev <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Removing static initializers for command > line options > Message-ID: <272A2B77-7B80-44DE-B111-3DB72BACC63B at apple.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Pete Cooper <peter_cooper at apple.com&...

...er_cooper at apple.com> > > To: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > > Cc: LLVM Dev <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Removing static initializers for command > > line options > > Message-ID: <272A2B77-7B80-44DE-B111-3DB72BACC63B at apple.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > > > > On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Pete Co...

...; > > > To: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > > > Cc: LLVM Dev <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Removing static initializers for command > > > line options > > > Message-ID: <272A2B77-7B80-44DE-B111-3DB72BACC63B at apple.com> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue...

I have a 5-500GB disk Raid-Z pool that has been producing checksum errors right after upgrading SXCE to build 121. They seem to be randomly occurring on all 5 disks, so it doesn''t look like a disk failure situation. Repeatingly running a scrub on the pools randomly repairs between 20 and a few hundred checksum errors. Since I hadn''t physically touched the machine, it seems a