Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "b0bc391b".
2012 Mar 19
0
[LLVMdev] recognizing DTORs and vptr updates in LLVM.
...ecide to emit these as relaxed atomic
stores, making the code well defined without changing the semantics (or
optimization) in any meaningful way, right?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120319/b0bc391b/attachment.html>
2012 Mar 19
5
[LLVMdev] recognizing DTORs and vptr updates in LLVM.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While instrumenting LLVM IR in ThreadSanitizer (race detector), I need
> to distinguish between a store to vtable pointer (vptr) and any other
> regular store.
> This special treatment should be limited to class