search for: b0bb7528

Oh, no. I should have been more clear. The patch was not rejected, just lost in the daily shuffle. I already have my employer's approval to send this upstream, so I will prepare a patch against trunk this morning. > I proposed a similar patch to LLVM (left circular shift) around 10/2011. > > Parts of my patch did make it into trunk about a year after, but others > > did not.

On Monday, July 30, 2012 12:16 AM, Cameron McInally wrote: > Hey Andy, > > I proposed a similar patch to LLVM (left circular shift) around 10/2011. > Parts of my patch did make it into trunk about a year after, but others > did not. > > At that time, my solution was to add a binary operator to the IRBuilder, > since LCS fits in nicely with the other shift operators. But,

...gt;> > did not. >> > > And now that I reread this... it should have been "month after", not "year > after". > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120731/b0bb7528/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- Index: include/llvm/Instruction.def =================================================================== --- include/llvm/Instruction.def (revision 161045) +++ include/llvm/Instruction.def (working copy) @@ -121,58 +121,59 @@ // Logical op...