Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "b06df945".
Did you mean:
b060f965
2015 Jan 31
1
[LLVMdev] unwind's permanent residence
On Jan 31, 2015 08:42, "Jonathan Roelofs" <jroelofs.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> My worry is the scenario of throwing in one dso, then running a cleanup
as you're unwinding through another dso. If that cleanup throws, and
invokes a different unwinder, there's no way for that second unwinder to
know about the state of the first. If this were c++, we'd break the