search for: azuma

...y/gems/1.8/gems/daemons-1.0.7/lib/daemons/ cmdline.rb:105:in `catch_exceptions'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/daemons-1.0.7/lib/daemons.rb:184:in `run_proc'' /path/to/my/app/vendor/plugins/backgroundrb/server/lib/ backgroundrb_server.rb:301:in `run'' Thanks, Daniel Azuma

...cation: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: dazuma at gmail.com It does not appear that sshd in OpenSSH implements section 6.9 of rfc 4254. That is, sending SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST with type "signal" for a channel, has no effect. This is being reproduced with a custom client, connecting to OpenSSH 4.7p1 sshd running on Linux (Fedora 8...

Hi, Anyone suggest why when I try to run the console via ''ruby script/console'' I get the following "uninitialized constant RAILS_ROOT" ?? Error: ================================ V:\Source\testapp>ruby script\console Loading development environment. ./script/../config/../config/environment.rb:3:NameError: uninitialized constant RAILS_ROOT

Hi I just setup a server (Apache 2.2, mod_proxy_balancer, mongrel_cluster) with 2 Rails applications according to this excellent Post: http://blog.codahale.com/2006/06/19/time-for-a-grown-up-server-rails-mongrel-apache-capistrano-and-you Everythings works great, but after a long inactive period (say one night), the first 3 connections allways get an Error 500 Excerpt from production.log: ...

Hi everyone, I need some insight into a problem I just started having. I''m running ruby 1.8.6 on an ubuntu box with the following gems installed: $ sudo gem list --local *** LOCAL GEMS *** actionmailer (2.3.5, 2.3.4, 2.3.2, 2.2.2) actionpack (2.3.5, 2.3.4, 2.3.2, 2.2.2) activerecord (2.3.5, 2.3.4, 2.3.2, 2.2.2) activeresource (2.3.5, 2.3.4, 2.3.2, 2.2.2) activesupport (2.3.5, 2.3.4,

Hello, I was wondering if people have a sense of the performance scalability of the routing system, in the number of map.connect statements. Is execution time (or memory usage) of routing any more than linear in the number of map.connects? I figure I''d ask before trying to reverse-engineer all the code generation... :) On a related note, the reason I potentially have a lot of