search for: ayshtmr

Hello everyone, I have completed introducing some code from v-hasu's branch into mine, mainly for Features, FeatureVector and FeatureManager classes. I have pushed the changes to https://github.com/ayshtmr/xapian/tree/letor-update. I am now proceeding to write unit tests for feature modules. There are a few things that I wanted to clarify: 1. I have introduced a lot of code in a single commit ( https://github.com/ayshtmr/xapian/commit/2abaf6b8d64b1624699c3f490b6dc441e1c6cdf3 ) Is it fine or should...

...be changed into lots of little classes, which might be an overhead right now but would be a good functionality to have in future. What would be the best approach here? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kind Regards, Ayush Tomar | My Webpage <http://ayshtmr.xyz> | LinkedIn <https://in.linkedin.com/in/ayushtomar> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xapian.org/pipermail/xapian-devel/attachments/20160627/a2341582/attachment.html>

Hello James, I am working on breaking down Features into sub-classes. Should each of the features get their own sub-class, or should the grouping be done according to type? i.e. query-document pair dependent, query-dependent and document dependent sub-classes. Using this approach makes more sense if we plan to add support for user to include query-dependent and document-dependent features in

...w. Its the user's job to make it consistent. Thanks for clarifying this. J > > -- > James Aylett, occasional trouble-maker > xapian.org > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kind Regards, Ayush Tomar | My Webpage <http://ayshtmr.xyz> | LinkedIn <https://in.linkedin.com/in/ayushtomar> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xapian.org/pipermail/xapian-devel/attachments/20160629/c7664970/attachment.html>