Displaying 20 results from an estimated 21 matches for "axiomatization".
Did you mean:
axiomatisation
2017 Aug 08
2
Improving SCEV's behavior around IR level no-wrap
Hi Sanjoy,
Any update on this?
Are there plans to implement this proposal?
Thanks,
Pankaj
-----Original Message-----
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 02:09:19 -0700
From: Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, Andrew Trick
<atrick at apple.com>, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com>, Hal Finkel
<hfinkel at anl.gov>,
2016 Sep 23
6
Improving SCEV's behavior around IR level no-wrap flags
Hi all,
This is about a project I've been prototyping on-and-off for a while
that has finally reached a point where I can claim it to be
"potentially viable". I'd like to gather some input from the
community before moving too far ahead.
# The problem
There is a representation issue within SCEV that prevents it from
fully using information from nsw/nuw flags present in the
2017 Aug 09
2
Improving SCEV's behavior around IR level no-wrap
> On Aug 8, 2017, at 5:34 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Pankaj,
>
> IIRC there was pushback on this proposal so I did not proceed further.
> Are you blocked on this?
>
> [+CC Andy, who I remember had some objections.]
>
> — Sanjoy
Off the top of my head, my concern is that expression comparison is no longer constant time,
2016 Jan 25
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:39:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:55:54AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release()
> > > and smp_read_acquire(),
> >
> > But they provide different grades
2016 Jan 25
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:39:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:55:54AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release()
> > > and smp_read_acquire(),
> >
> > But they provide different grades
2017 Oct 04
0
how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?
On 10/04/2017 04:23 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>
> Mark, Many Non-Centos originated packages create directories in /var/run as
> part of the install, and expect them to still exist after a reboot.
>
> They then fail when starting the service because they're trying to create a
> PID / Lock file in a directory that no longer exists. This problem has been
> around ever since
2004 Apr 22
0
ade4 package update
The ade4 package (v. 1.2-1) has been updated on CRAN.
New features include:
- functions based on Rao's axiomatization of diversity measures : Rao's
diversity coefficient and dissimilarity coefficient (divc and disc)
- functions based on Excoffier et al. analysis of molecular variance
with tests of the difference among the factors (amova).
- functions introducing double principal coordinate analysis (dpcoa)....
2004 Apr 22
0
ade4 package update
The ade4 package (v. 1.2-1) has been updated on CRAN.
New features include:
- functions based on Rao's axiomatization of diversity measures : Rao's
diversity coefficient and dissimilarity coefficient (divc and disc)
- functions based on Excoffier et al. analysis of molecular variance
with tests of the difference among the factors (amova).
- functions introducing double principal coordinate analysis (dpcoa)....
2007 Sep 28
1
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ in LLVM bitcode
Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If
it's available please where could I download it from?
Thanks.
Napi
2007 Sep 28
0
[LLVMdev] libstdc++ in LLVM bitcode
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:08:31AM +0800, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote:
> Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If
> it's available please where could I download it from?
I did this last year.
Check out:
http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/dietstdcxx.1.tar.bz2
--Emil
2006 Jul 05
6
upload file in a database or a server?
Hi,
I would like some suggestions. I''m wondering if it''s better to upload a
file directly into a database or to put the file into the server and
keep the path in the database?
Thanks,
Eric
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2013 Jul 03
2
Adding browsers
Recently, I put CentOS 6.4 on one of the four PCs I keep behind a
KVM switch. I like it a whole lot in most ways, but Fedora has spoiled
me : I install almost every browser I can, and generally keep half a
dozen or more open, mostly with several tens of tabs open. Iow, I use
browsers as I used to use books, back in the Carboniferous when I had a
desk in the stacks.
Are there ways a
2017 Oct 04
8
how to prevent files and directories from being deleted?
On Tuesday 03 October 2017 18:24:01 Mark Haney wrote:
> What issue? That the PID is dropped on reboot?? What else are you
> putting in there?? I'm beginning to question whether you know what
> you're doing or not.? Lighttpd doesn't store any persistent info in
> /var/run/ because, like everything else, /var/run isn't for persistent
> data.
Mark, Many Non-Centos
2007 May 12
5
[LLVMdev] C back-end differences
On Fri, 11 May 2007, me22 wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure how llvm-g++ works. I think it goes through the
> standard gcc sequence (gimple, rtl, and such) but then outputs LLVM
> (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html), which is the intermediate
> representation used by the rest of the chain. To make an LLVM backend
> you would not need to deal with RTL and such at all.
llvm-g++
2007 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] Problem building LLVM-GCC 4.0 Front End
I've read and followed the README.LLVM file that comes with LLVM-GCC 4.0
Front End source, but got the following error when compiling:
configure: error: You must specify valid path to your LLVM tree with
--enable-llvm=DIR
make: *** [configure-gcc] Error 1
I've done the following in csh before hand:
$ setenv LLVMOBJDIR /home/napi/proj/c2jvm/llvm/llvm-gcc/obj
Where did I go wrong?
2016 Sep 23
3
Improving SCEV's behavior around IR level no-wrap flags
On 23 Sep 2016, at 11:08, Andrew Trick via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 23, 2016, at 2:09 AM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is about a project I've been prototyping on-and-off for a while
>> that has finally reached a point where I can claim it to be
>>
2016 Jan 26
0
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:02:34PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:39:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 09:55:54AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release()
2011 Aug 31
9
Centos VPS Kernel 2.6.35.4 & 'string-less' IP tables
On a VPS I wanted to add to IP tables:-
iptables -A XXXX -p tcp -m string --algo bm --string 'login' -j DROP
I got:
iptables: Unknown error 18446744073709551615
uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how this got installed)
lsmod | grep ipt = ipt_LOG 5419 2
yum upgrade iptables* = nothing to install.
---------------------------------------
On a standalone server (C 5.6)
2017 Jun 05
10
[Bug 12819] New: [PATCH] sync() on receiving side for data consistency
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12819
Bug ID: 12819
Summary: [PATCH] sync() on receiving side for data consistency
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
2016 Jan 15
5
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release()
> and smp_read_acquire(),
But they provide different grades of transitivity, which is where all
the confusion lays.
smp_mb() is strongly/globally transitive, all CPUs will agree on the order.
Whereas the RCpc release+acquire is weakly so, only the two