search for: axiomat

...xpression to indicate no-wrap; since the no-wrap flag is just a "cache" of a proof based on the structure of the SCEV expression, and _does_ apply to all SCEV expressions with the same shapes. Concretely, we'll endow relevant SCEV expression types with two sets distinct of flags: - AxiomaticFlags: These flags follow from nsw/nuw annotations in the IR. These will be part of the key the SCEV expression is unique'd on. - ComputedFlags: These flags are derived from the structure of the SCEV expression, and they're *not* a part of the key the SCEV expression is uniqu...

...xpression to indicate no-wrap; since the no-wrap flag is just a "cache" of a proof based on the structure of the SCEV expression, and _does_ apply to all SCEV expressions with the same shapes. Concretely, we'll endow relevant SCEV expression types with two sets distinct of flags: - AxiomaticFlags: These flags follow from nsw/nuw annotations in the IR. These will be part of the key the SCEV expression is unique'd on. - ComputedFlags: These flags are derived from the structure of the SCEV expression, and they're *not* a part of the key the SCEV expression is uniqu...

...e the no-wrap flag is just a "cache" of a proof based on the structure of the SCEV expression, and _does_ apply to all SCEV expressions with the same shapes. >> >> Concretely, we'll endow relevant SCEV expression types with two sets distinct of flags: >> >> - AxiomaticFlags: These flags follow from nsw/nuw annotations in the >> IR. These will be part of the key the SCEV expression is unique'd >> on. >> - ComputedFlags: These flags are derived from the structure of the >> SCEV expression, and they're *not* a part of the key...

...+agree on the order of operations. In contrast, a chain of release-acquire > +pairs provides only "local transitivity", so that only those CPUs on > +the chain are guaranteed to agree on the combined order of the accesses. Thanks for having a go at this. I tried defining something axiomatically, but got stuck pretty quickly. In my scheme, I used "data-directed transitivity" instead of "local transitivity", since the latter seems to be a bit of a misnomer. > +For example, switching to C code in deference to Herman Hollerith: > + > + int u, v, x, y, z; &g...

...+agree on the order of operations. In contrast, a chain of release-acquire > +pairs provides only "local transitivity", so that only those CPUs on > +the chain are guaranteed to agree on the combined order of the accesses. Thanks for having a go at this. I tried defining something axiomatically, but got stuck pretty quickly. In my scheme, I used "data-directed transitivity" instead of "local transitivity", since the latter seems to be a bit of a misnomer. > +For example, switching to C code in deference to Herman Hollerith: > + > + int u, v, x, y, z; &g...

...ircles.? If you can't build from source to keep from using non-standard packages, then you really shouldn't be doing whatever it is you were hired to do. This is extremely basic arithmetic here.? You don't do surgery with dirty scalpels, you don't drive without brakes, these are axiomatic just like /var/run isn't persistent.? It's been that way at least since I was in HS and college in the 80s and very very likely since the early Unix days. Honestly, I feel bad for your employer if you think this is an acceptable way to get a system working. There, I've said my p...

The ade4 package (v. 1.2-1) has been updated on CRAN. New features include: - functions based on Rao's axiomatization of diversity measures : Rao's diversity coefficient and dissimilarity coefficient (divc and disc) - functions based on Excoffier et al. analysis of molecular variance with tests of the difference among the factors (amova). - functions introducing double principal coordinate analysis (d...

The ade4 package (v. 1.2-1) has been updated on CRAN. New features include: - functions based on Rao's axiomatization of diversity measures : Rao's diversity coefficient and dissimilarity coefficient (divc and disc) - functions based on Excoffier et al. analysis of molecular variance with tests of the difference among the factors (amova). - functions introducing double principal coordinate analysis (d...

Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If it's available please where could I download it from? Thanks. Napi

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:08:31AM +0800, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote: > Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If > it's available please where could I download it from? I did this last year. Check out: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/dietstdcxx.1.tar.bz2 --Emil

Hi, I would like some suggestions. I''m wondering if it''s better to upload a file directly into a database or to put the file into the server and keep the path in the database? Thanks, Eric -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Recently, I put CentOS 6.4 on one of the four PCs I keep behind a KVM switch. I like it a whole lot in most ways, but Fedora has spoiled me : I install almost every browser I can, and generally keep half a dozen or more open, mostly with several tens of tabs open. Iow, I use browsers as I used to use books, back in the Carboniferous when I had a desk in the stacks. Are there ways a

On Tuesday 03 October 2017 18:24:01 Mark Haney wrote: > What issue? That the PID is dropped on reboot?? What else are you > putting in there?? I'm beginning to question whether you know what > you're doing or not.? Lighttpd doesn't store any persistent info in > /var/run/ because, like everything else, /var/run isn't for persistent > data. Mark, Many Non-Centos

On Fri, 11 May 2007, me22 wrote: > I'm not exactly sure how llvm-g++ works. I think it goes through the > standard gcc sequence (gimple, rtl, and such) but then outputs LLVM > (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html), which is the intermediate > representation used by the rest of the chain. To make an LLVM backend > you would not need to deal with RTL and such at all. llvm-g++

...t need to deal with RTL and such at all. > > llvm-g++ converts from trees to high-gimple to LLVM. RTL is not involved. > > LLVM also does have an MSIL backend, if you are interested in a JVM > backend, it may be a starting point. > > -Chris > -- Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah Axiomatic Solutions Sdn Bhd napi at axiomsol.com http://www.axiomsol.com

...hat problem. I hope that I understood Sanjoy its attempt correctly. I belief that a non-wrap and a wrap instruction result into two different SCEV expressions. > >> Concretely, we'll endow relevant SCEV expression types with two sets >> distinct of flags: >> >> - AxiomaticFlags: These flags follow from nsw/nuw annotations in the >> IR. These will be part of the key the SCEV expression is unique'd >> on. >> - ComputedFlags: These flags are derived from the structure of the >> SCEV expression, and they're *not* a part of the key th...

...of operations. In contrast, a chain of release-acquire > > +pairs provides only "local transitivity", so that only those CPUs on > > +the chain are guaranteed to agree on the combined order of the accesses. > > Thanks for having a go at this. I tried defining something axiomatically, > but got stuck pretty quickly. In my scheme, I used "data-directed > transitivity" instead of "local transitivity", since the latter seems to > be a bit of a misnomer. I figured that "local" meant local to the CPUs participating in the release-acquire...

On a VPS I wanted to add to IP tables:- iptables -A XXXX -p tcp -m string --algo bm --string 'login' -j DROP I got: iptables: Unknown error 18446744073709551615 uname -a = 2.6.35.4 #2 (don't know how this got installed) lsmod | grep ipt = ipt_LOG 5419 2 yum upgrade iptables* = nothing to install. --------------------------------------- On a standalone server (C 5.6)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12819 Bug ID: 12819 Summary: [PATCH] sync() on receiving side for data consistency Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 01:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > So smp_mb() provides transitivity, as do pairs of smp_store_release() > and smp_read_acquire(), But they provide different grades of transitivity, which is where all the confusion lays. smp_mb() is strongly/globally transitive, all CPUs will agree on the order. Whereas the RCpc release+acquire is weakly so, only the two