search for: awkwardly

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1426 matches for "awkwardly".

Did you mean: awkward
2015 Mar 09
2
Upgrading Xen 3 on SL 5 server with CentOS 5 and SL 5
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Pasi K?rkk?inen <pasik at iki.fi> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:07:54AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> Sorry about the accidental bulky quoting! Boston public transit is still slow from storms, and I'm using my phone right now.
2015 Feb 22
2
Upgrading Xen 3 on SL 5 server with CentOS 5 and SL 5
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:07:54AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Sorry about the accidental bulky quoting! Boston public transit is still slow from storms, and I'm using my phone right now. > > Also, has Xen console access gotten any better for fully virtualized guests? I've just been forcibly reminded how awkward it was to access the Linux installation screens to manipulate
2010 May 11
3
Advice needed on awkward tables
Dear r-help list members, I am quite new to R, and hope to seek advice from you about a problem I have been cracking my head over. Apologies if this seems like a simple problem. I have essentially two tables. The first (Table A) is a standard patient clinicopathological data table, where rows correspond to patient IDs and columns correspond to clinical features. Records in this table are stored
2016 Jul 07
2
Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] mllib: Add some imperative list manipulation functions.
On Thursday 07 July 2016 17:30:03 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This adds imperative list manipulation functions inspired by Perl. > The functions are passed list refs which get updated in place. > > This allows us to replace some awkward pure functional code like: > > let xs = ys in > let xs = if foo then xs @ zs else xs in > > with: > > let xs = ref ys in
2008 Sep 30
1
Version 2.7.2 GUI acts awkward?
hi, I am running R 2.7.2 Windows - recently the GUI-windows (for example to "change directory" or "read in R-scripts") do not open - well, they open, but close down directly afterwards. I can't select a directory or file ... I tried re-installing R - same problem again. does anybody have an idea? thanks gregor -- Gregor Rolshausen PhD Student; University of
2007 Feb 25
0
moving local files, remote mirroring, and --link-dest awkwardness
I have some pictures that I unload from the camera into: dir/tmp and at night I automatically rsync all of dir/ to some remote:dir/ Then days or weeks later I do some local sorting, and I make lots of image moves of the sort where image dir/tmp/bar goes to to dir/category1/bar, possibly linked also into dir/category2/bar. Then rsync runs the next night, notices the "new" image
2007 Jul 21
1
R2WinBUGS awkward to use
Hi All Does anyone know if I can avoid to use the write.model() function below? I dont want to do this. Can't bugs() do that automatically for me just by specifying the 4th argument 'model'? Just I like I am also using the 'inits' object! If I use 'model' in the same way as I use 'inits' I am getting the error: > sim <- bugs(data, inits, parameters,
2014 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] awkward object file abstractions
Hello LLVM, I'm trying to make symbolizing work in llvm-objdump. This comment in ObjectFile.h gives me some heartburn: https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/include/llvm/Object/ObjectFile.h#L196 // The main goal of // this is to allow SymbolRef::SymbolPimpl to point directly to the symbol // entry in the memory mapped object file. SymbolPimpl cannot contain any // virtual
2008 Aug 26
2
awkward behavior with densityplot function
Hi, I have the following script: ---- t.R --- grafica <- function() { v <- read.csv('preprocessed/komolongma.ece.uprm.edu.active',sep=',') x <- as.ts(v$active) bitmap(file="output.png") densityplot(~x,col='blue',main='Density Plot') dev.off() } grafica() ---- t.R --- When I "sourced" it from R prompt, it quietly runs.
2016 Jul 08
2
Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] mllib: Add some imperative list manipulation functions.
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:08:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 07:00:46PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > On Thursday 07 July 2016 17:30:03 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > This adds imperative list manipulation functions inspired by Perl. > > > The functions are passed list refs which get updated in place. > > > > > > This
2009 Aug 11
1
Awkward escaping with five backslashes within \code{ } in new parse_Rd
Hi R-devels, I noticed that you are working quite actively on the new Rd-parser and have made it the default renderer in R-2.10.0dev. So I would like to come back on an issue I have already raised on this list last November ("Two minor escaping issues using \preformatted{....} in Rd format") My setting has slightly changed as \preformatted, AFAICS is not supported within \describe
2020 Mar 25
2
Re: nbdkit / mingw support
On 3/25/20 7:16 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I think I understand now that libnbdkit.so won't break the ABI for > existing plugins. Does it require that plugins for newer nbdkit use > -lnbdkit (which would be a source API break) or would it still be > possible to compile without this? I guess as long as plugins do not > start using -no-undefined then it would still work, so
2009 Apr 24
9
[LLVMdev] Calling-convention lowering proposal
...:ARG_FLAGS, as well as the old LowerArguments and LowerCallTo hooks. To replace them, it adds three new TargetLowering hooks: LowerCall, LowerFormalArguments, and LowerReturn. These hooks provide targets with the same information as the special nodes, except in an immediately usable form instead of awkwardly encoded as SDNode operands. The patch also re-works a substantial portion of the target-independent tail-call code. The patch also includes changes for all in-tree targets to use the new hooks. Beyond dejagnu and some manual assembly output inspection, so far I've only tested this on x86 targe...
2012 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:51 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 18 Oct 2012, at 23:03, Owen Anderson wrote: > >> For me, the concerns are much more about privacy than about security. I'm not really bothered by the idea of my Phabricator account being compromised, and I will use one-off credentials to ensure that a compromise of it will not impact
2008 Feb 28
3
Collapse an array
Suppose I have a 4-D array X with dimensions (dx, dy, dz, dp). I want to collapse the first 3 dimensions of X to make a 2-D array Y with dimensions (dx*dy*dz, dp). Instead of awkward looping, what is a good way to do this? Is there a similar function like reshape in Matlab? Thanks, Gang
2012 Sep 20
1
Fortune nomination
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:01 AM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: (In response to an OP's aplogy for an "awkwardly worded question"): > Awkwardly worded questions will get much better answers if they are accompanied by some test data. Fortune nomination! Cheers, Bert > -- > David Winsemius, MD > Alameda, CA, USA > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-proje...
2010 Aug 06
3
data.frame: return all rows where at least one...
Hi, I know ways to do this but they all seem awkward and I somehow believe that there is a convenient shortcut. If I have a data.frame with many columns, how can I request all rows for which at least one column satisfy an expression? For instance, all rows where at least one column is negative. Many thanks, Werner
2017 Oct 21
2
Removing the register block in MIR
The MIR format currently has a short-hand syntax for declaring vreg classes and banks in the function body so you can write something like this: name: foo body: | %3:gpr(s64) = ... rather than the much more verbose and awkward: name: foo registers: - { id: 3, class: gpr } body: | %3(s64) = ... I'd like to make this shorthand the only way to do this. There are a few
2016 Jan 25
4
Just need to vent
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:56:21PM +0000, Always Learning wrote: > Of course Alice can. All of us can. Hopefully it is constructive > criticism. Seeing good software being replaced by less good, less > useful and more awkward software usually provoke the software's users to > protest. Complaining on the CentOS list is probably not that productive, though. -- Jonathan Billings
2012 Oct 20
3
[LLVMdev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews
On 18 Oct 2012, at 23:03, Owen Anderson wrote: > For me, the concerns are much more about privacy than about security. I'm not really bothered by the idea of my Phabricator account being compromised, and I will use one-off credentials to ensure that a compromise of it will not impact other accounts that I care about more. > > What does bother me is the loss of privacy implied by