Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "awesomest".
Did you mean:
awesome
2012 Nov 16
6
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
...Is there a reason we currently prefer files to log messages?
>
> I suspect not. I would much prefer your suggestion. If you can
> implement the fix to our scripts (and get Tanya or Chris or Anton to
> give you access), I would be thrilled.
I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
[cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.
Even if it required some heuristics and horrible hackery in the commit script, it would be worth it.
-Chris
2012 Nov 30
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
Hi,
Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Chris Lattner wrote:
> > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
> >
> > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.
>
> commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - %(log)s
I just realized that this line does not match Chris' s...
2012 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
...prefer files to log messages?
> >
> > I suspect not. I would much prefer your suggestion. If you can
> > implement the fix to our scripts (and get Tanya or Chris or Anton to
> > give you access), I would be thrilled.
>
> I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
>
> [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.
>
> Even if it required some heuristics and horrible hackery in the commit script, it would be worth it.
I see that currently the com...
2012 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
...rently prefer files to log messages?
>>
>> I suspect not. I would much prefer your suggestion. If you can
>> implement the fix to our scripts (and get Tanya or Chris or Anton to
>> give you access), I would be thrilled.
>
> I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
>
> [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.
Moving the important information first may also be worth considering.
Subject lines are often cut off.
I prefer
[lib/Analysis] Fix bad CF...
2012 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> Chris Lattner wrote:
>> > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
>> >
>> > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.
>>
>> commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - %(log)s
>
> I just realized that this line does...
2012 Nov 16
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
...messages?
>>>
>>> I suspect not. I would much prefer your suggestion. If you can
>>> implement the fix to our scripts (and get Tanya or Chris or Anton to
>>> give you access), I would be thrilled.
>>
>> I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
>>
>> [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.
>
> Moving the important information first may also be worth considering. Subject lines are often cut off.
>
> I prefer...
2012 Nov 30
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
David Blaikie wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >> Chris Lattner wrote:
> >> > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
> >> >
> >> > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.
> >>
> >> commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - %(log)s
> >
> > I jus...
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
...ote:
> David Blaikie wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> >> Chris Lattner wrote:
>> >> > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
>> >> >
>> >> > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.
>> >>
>> >> commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - %(log)s
Using r1...
2012 Nov 15
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi, everyone. I was comparing our commit messages with another commit list I'm on, and I realized (not for the first time) that our subject lines are less than useful. Why don't we have the first line of our commit messages in the subject lines? Compare:
>
> [cfe-commits] r167788 - in
2012 Nov 15
4
[LLVMdev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
Hi, everyone. I was comparing our commit messages with another commit list I'm on, and I realized (not for the first time) that our subject lines are less than useful. Why don't we have the first line of our commit messages in the subject lines? Compare:
[cfe-commits] r167788 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Analysis/CFG.cpp test/Analysis/dead-stores.cpp
with
[cfe-commits] r167788 - Fix bad CFG
2013 Jan 24
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
...ote:
> David Blaikie wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> >> Chris Lattner wrote:
>> >> > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
>> >> >
>> >> > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.
>> >>
>> >> commit_subject_template = %(prefix)s r%(revision)s - %(log)s
Using r1...