search for: awarix

...implements its own Java compiler and bytecode translator. Has it been hooked up to a JVM? If so, how and which ones? Thanks for your other answers re annotations and memory model. -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

...imizing transformation. 4. Has anyone written Java JNI classes+native code that "wrap" the LLVM API, so that the LLVM libraries can be utilized from Java code? Thanks, -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

...riate > optimization-useful information from the front end to LLVM in a > non-Java-specific way (e.g., see "active use" check above). > > -Archie > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -- Alkis

...frame? This is another thing that would be required for Java if e.g. you wanted to detect null pointer access via signals. Note setjmp/longjmp works OK across signal frames. Thanks, -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

...ld be required for Java if e.g. you wanted to detect null > pointer access via signals. Note setjmp/longjmp works OK across signal > frames. > > Thanks, > -Archie > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -- Alkis

...ode? No, there's no Java interface at this time. Patches accepted :) There is, however, a burgeoning PyPy interfaces that is being developed. > > Thanks, > -Archie > __________________________________________________________________________ > Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com > You're welcome. Hope it was useful. I'm sure others will respond as well, so stay tuned. Reid Spencer. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 byte...

...ms for passing through all appropriate optimization-useful information from the front end to LLVM in a non-Java-specific way (e.g., see "active use" check above). -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Related idea.. what if all instructions (not just "invoke") could be > allowed to have an optional "except label ..."? This is the direction that we plan to go, when someone is interested enough to implement it. There are some rough high-level notes about this idea here:

...pond. Otherwise, you'll need to take a look at the code. > > Thanks for your other answers re annotations and memory model. You're welcome. > > -Archie > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text atta...

...dy invented this and given it a better name. Related idea.. what if all instructions (not just "invoke") could be allowed to have an optional "except label ..."? -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Archie Cobbs wrote: >> I haven't started this, so I have no idea how I would handle passing >> the information back and forth. > > With no annotation support, it doesn't seem like you can. This is > the problem. I'm not saying annotations are good, just that they > represent one (sub-optimal) solution to the problem. Without them, > we

...ar (don't forget I'm the "newbie" here :-) I'd be interested to hear any ideas along these lines that are brewing (if this is the right place to discuss them). -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

.... If e.g. you're loading LLVM pre-compiled modules then you can never do this optimization because you can't recover the Java type information (which is front-end specific). -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

>>>>> "Archie" == Archie Cobbs <archie at dellroad.org> writes: Archie> Perhaps it is. In which case, I guess we need something better or else Archie> we'll never be able to do certain optimizations. I'm curious to know which optimizations you have in mind. Tom

...with. So then you no longer have to worry about what happens to the annotations during a transformation. OK I'll shut up now and go read about annotation in the archives... :-) -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 09:01 -0500, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Requoting myself: > > > I.e., my question is the more general one: > > how do optimizations that are specific to the front-end language get > > done? How does the front-end "secret knowledge" get passed through > > somehow so it can be used for optimization purposes? > > -Archie Archie,

...onsidered > it for gcj.) I'm not that familiar with how your stuff works, but it sounds like you would have to do these optimizations before converting to LLVM format, right? -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

...e specific to the front-end language get > done? How does the front-end "secret knowledge" get passed through > somehow so it can be used for optimization purposes? -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

...ve this issue, which people are starting to think about, which is good. It's definitely a challenging and interesting question and I'm not sure what would be the best answer. -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com

On Apr 30, 2006, at 10:42 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: >> I want to implement the register allocation algorithm described in >> the >> paper "Register Allocation via Coloring of Chordal Graphs, >> APLAS'05" in >> LLVM. This is a graph coloring algorithm that can find an optimal >>