Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "avrelay".
2004 Aug 06
2
optimization possible?
hi,
i did some tests about performance in jspeex ...
uls@mainframe:~/eclipse/avrelay$ java TestClient
Diff1: 0
10
Diff2: 141
started.
uls@mainframe:~/eclipse/avrelay$
<p>{
SpeexEncoder e1=new SpeexEncoder();
e1.init(0,1,44100,1);
byte[] by1=new byte[320];
long l1=System.currentTimeMillis();
long l2=System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("...
2004 Aug 06
4
[Fwd: Re: [JDEV] Videoconferencing with jabber / Re: Videoconferencing with speex and jabber]
...ve to be added, which won't make things less
complicative.+
Of course it is possible to create a standalone server relay, too.
But my relation to jabber.org tells me to do it that way... ;-)
ok.
to speex: *now here comes the more important part, can we build a c++
component which does what avrelay does? is it practicable to de/encode
100 streams with a c/c++ speex de/encoder in realtime?* COMMENTS WELCOME
<p>The other part is, what do you think about a cooperation? All help on
this welcome!
<p>to jabber: *We would need some protocol enhancements to the jabber
protocol to contr...
2004 Aug 06
0
optimization possible?
hi,
Ulrich B. Staudinger wrote:
> uls@mainframe:~/eclipse/avrelay$ java TestClient
> Diff1: 0
> 10
> Diff2: 141
> started.
> uls@mainframe:~/eclipse/avrelay$
Sorry, i think this number (diff2) occured due to jvm startup load ...
when doing repetive encoding the numbers are much closer to Marc's
minimum requirements (with Diff being the elaps...
2004 Aug 06
0
[Fwd: Re: [JDEV] Videoconferencing with jabber / Re: Videoconferencing with speex and jabber]
...Yes, could be right. But we have to thing about that a stand alone
solution is more flexible and can also be implemented in other
messenger (is this fait to tell this here <d&r>?).
> to speex: *now here comes the more important part, can we build a c++
> component which does what avrelay does? is it practicable to de/encode
> 100 streams with a c/c++ speex de/encoder in realtime?* COMMENTS WELCOME
I dont know what the exact timing is, but we can convert avrelay
to C++. We have to test the performance then. I can't say how much
better it will go.
> The other part is, wh...
2004 Aug 06
0
[Fwd: Re: [JDEV] Videoconferencing with jabber / Re: Videoconferencing with speex and jabber]
> to speex: *now here comes the more important part, can we build a c++
> component which does what avrelay does? is it practicable to de/encode
> 100 streams with a c/c++ speex de/encoder in realtime?* COMMENTS WELCOME
At low bit-rate (6-8 kbps) and lowest complexity, it's probably possible
to encode 100 streams on a 3 GHz machine (and decoding is cheap), but
that's all you're going to d...
2004 Aug 06
1
[Fwd: Re: [JDEV] Videoconferencing with jabber / Re: Videoconferencing with speex and jabber]
Hi Jean-Marc,
<p>>>to speex: *now here comes the more important part, can we build a c++
>>component which does what avrelay does? is it practicable to de/encode
>>100 streams with a c/c++ speex de/encoder in realtime?* COMMENTS WELCOME
> At low bit-rate (6-8 kbps) and lowest complexity, it's probably possible
> to encode 100 streams on a 3 GHz machine (and decoding is cheap), but
> that's all you&...
2004 Aug 06
3
q about jspeex
Hi Marc,
thanks for the quick reply.
Marc Gimpel wrote:
> It would appear the the 'pcm2speex.read(frame, 0, frame.length)' is
> blocking which means that it is waiting for data from the underlying
> inputstream (i.e.AudioInputStream(t.input)). If it could read
> sufficient data it would transcode it. If it recieved an EOF, it
> should do some zero padding and then