Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "avir".
Did you mean:
avi
2018 Jan 03
3
Coping with non-standard evaluation in R program analysis
Hello R experts,
I plan to develop a tool for dynamic analysis of R programs. I would like to trace function calls at runtime, capturing argument and return values. Following a suggestion made some time ago on this list, my high-level implementation strategy is to rewrite the AST, augmenting call expressions with pre-call and post-call shims to capture the arguments and return value,
2018 Jan 04
0
Coping with non-standard evaluation in R program analysis
...genthat
We don?t really deal with NSE though. It could be something worth thinking about for us.
The contact for genthtat is Filip.
We are also writing a tool for analyzing promises and generating execution traces
within the R VM. This is available in
https://github.com/PRL-PRG/R-dyntrace
Aviral and Konrad are the contacts there.
Best,
jan
Jan Vitek, Professor
Computer Science,
Northeastern University
> On Jan 3, 2018, at 7:18 PM, Peter Meilstrup <peter.meilstrup at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For 2), it is not exposed in R's standard library but it is exposed i...
2019 Mar 02
2
Support for out-of-tree backend passes?
...pass builds? Similarly, would work in the direction of supporting those
builds be welcome? If so, it's something I'd like to look at.
Best,
William Woodruff
william at yossarian.net
[1]: https://github.com/samolisov/llvm-experiments/tree/master/llvm-backend-x86-machine-passes
[2]: http://aviral.lab.asu.edu/llvm-writing-a-backend-pass/
[3]: (Thread) https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-November/092030.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <...
2015 Jun 10
4
[LLVMdev] The use iterator not working...
Thanks Dan and Jon. I made an incorrect assumption that the "use" iterator
was actually giving me the "user" when de-referencing it.
Did it always have this behavior in previous LLVM versions? I've seen lots
of examples of the "use" iterator being dereferenced and resulting
Instruction pointer being treated as the "user"?
Thanks,
Zack
On Tue, Jun 9,