Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "avgdroppacket".
Did you mean:
avgdroppackets
2019 Jul 23
2
[PATCH] virtio-net: parameterize min ring num_free for virtio receive
...ault
>> driver with the value of 1/2 * queue, while test2 is with my patch and
>> min_numfree set to 64 (the default budget value). We can see average
>> drop packets do decrease a lot in test2. Let me know if you need the
>> full testing data.
>>
>> test1Time??? avgDropPackets??? test2Time??? avgDropPackets??? pps
>>
>>> 16:21.0??? 12.295??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
>>> 17:19.1??? 15.244??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
>>> 18:17.5??? 18.789??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
>>> 19:15.1??? 14.208??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
>>> 20:13.2??? 20.818?...
2019 Jul 23
2
[PATCH] virtio-net: parameterize min ring num_free for virtio receive
...ault
>> driver with the value of 1/2 * queue, while test2 is with my patch and
>> min_numfree set to 64 (the default budget value). We can see average
>> drop packets do decrease a lot in test2. Let me know if you need the
>> full testing data.
>>
>> test1Time??? avgDropPackets??? test2Time??? avgDropPackets??? pps
>>
>>> 16:21.0??? 12.295??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
>>> 17:19.1??? 15.244??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
>>> 18:17.5??? 18.789??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
>>> 19:15.1??? 14.208??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
>>> 20:13.2??? 20.818?...
2019 Jul 19
1
[PATCH] virtio-net: parameterize min ring num_free for virtio receive
...pet from our test result. Test1 was done with default
driver with the value of 1/2 * queue, while test2 is with my patch and
min_numfree set to 64 (the default budget value). We can see average
drop packets do decrease a lot in test2. Let me know if you need the
full testing data.
test1Time??? avgDropPackets??? test2Time??? avgDropPackets??? pps
> 16:21.0??? 12.295??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> 17:19.1??? 15.244??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> 18:17.5??? 18.789??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> 19:15.1??? 14.208??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> 20:13.2??? 20.818??? 56:50.4??? 0.267??? 300k
> 21:11.2??? 12.3...
2019 Jul 19
0
[PATCH] virtio-net: parameterize min ring num_free for virtio receive
...1 was done with default
> driver with the value of 1/2 * queue, while test2 is with my patch and
> min_numfree set to 64 (the default budget value). We can see average
> drop packets do decrease a lot in test2. Let me know if you need the
> full testing data.
>
> test1Time??? avgDropPackets??? test2Time??? avgDropPackets??? pps
>
> > 16:21.0??? 12.295??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> > 17:19.1??? 15.244??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> > 18:17.5??? 18.789??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> > 19:15.1??? 14.208??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> > 20:13.2??? 20.818??? 56:50.4??? 0.26...
2019 Aug 13
0
[PATCH] virtio-net: parameterize min ring num_free for virtio receive
...the value of 1/2 * queue, while test2 is with my patch and
> >> min_numfree set to 64 (the default budget value). We can see average
> >> drop packets do decrease a lot in test2. Let me know if you need the
> >> full testing data.
> >>
> >> test1Time??? avgDropPackets??? test2Time??? avgDropPackets??? pps
> >>
> >>> 16:21.0??? 12.295??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> >>> 17:19.1??? 15.244??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> >>> 18:17.5??? 18.789??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> >>> 19:15.1??? 14.208??? 56:50.4??? 0??? 300k
> &...
2019 Jul 18
4
[PATCH] virtio-net: parameterize min ring num_free for virtio receive
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:42:47AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:01:05PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On 2019/7/18 ??9:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:55:50PM +0000, ? jiang wrote:
> > > > This change makes ring buffer reclaim threshold num_free configurable
> > > > for better
2019 Jul 18
4
[PATCH] virtio-net: parameterize min ring num_free for virtio receive
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:42:47AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:01:05PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On 2019/7/18 ??9:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:55:50PM +0000, ? jiang wrote:
> > > > This change makes ring buffer reclaim threshold num_free configurable
> > > > for better