Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "availibl".
Did you mean:
availible
1999 Jan 23
3
What kind of system works best?
If any of you recall, I sent a message before regarding issues with a
100 client-based Samba server. After speaking with the company I'm
working with and showing them some of the replies, they are enthusiastic
about the system, and we're all looking forward to seeing it working.
Thank you for all your replies and for your help. There were quite a
few replies, and I can't get a
2005 May 11
1
high availibilty (heartbeats) - a good way to ensure automatic redundency?
...from a telecoms background, the thought of a single asterisk box
solution (even in a low production environment of say <10 phones)
worries me slightly!
starting from say a base of asterisk@home, you would have several
MySQL databases, in addition to numerous config files.
I have looked at high availiblity solutions, and from a hardware
monitoring point of view, its relitivly straight forward, you have 2
(identical?) boxes, each with 2 network interfaces. One of the
network interface cards on each box has the same IP address, there is
another cable that is sending a heartbeat message between the...
1999 Jan 25
0
SAMBA digest 1954
...5 -0600 (CST)
>From: "A.G. Russell IV" <arussell@bifrost.hos.net>
>To: samba@samba.org, ben@amvalue.com
>Subject: Re: What kind of system works best?
>Message-ID: <199901241905.NAA19548@bifrost.hos.net>
>
>Ben, just as a thought, why not attack this as a High Availiblity
>problem, much cheaper than fault-tolerant... Most fault-tolerant
>solutions that I have seen, (Compaq/Tandem,Sequent,Digital) will run
>in the neighborhood of $100,000.00 USD or more.
>
>With Linux and little scripting you could have 2 solid servers, and a
>fail-over solutio...