search for: available_featur

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "available_featur".

Did you mean: available_feature
2015 Sep 16
5
RFC: LTO should use -disable-llvm-verifier
> On Sep 16, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-Sep-02, at 19:31, Peter
2017 Jul 27
0
Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
...correct modules (since the OCaml modules are hand-written, and it's > awkward to include generated bits in them). My suggestion was to create a single OptGroups module, with all the foo_available functions. Instead of all the functions, another option could be like the following: type available_feature = | ACL | AUGEAS ... val available : available_feature -> bool > Other notes: > > - daemon must be linked to -ldl -lm because the OCaml runtime > (libasmrun.so) depends on both. I don't understand, at least here it links with them: $ readelf -d /usr/lib64/...
2017 Mar 04
2
[llvm-lit] Is it possible to write a test for Linux only?
It is $target dependent. I’m curious what makes you think it is $host dependent. Thanks, Taewook On 3/3/17, 5:10 PM, "Jonathan Roelofs" <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote: On 3/3/17 12:23 PM, Taewook Oh wrote: > Thanks Jon. Actually I tried “x86_64-linux”, but it makes the test “Unsupported” from my linux machine, and it was because my test is under
2018 Jan 17
12
[6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 1 tagged
Dear testers, Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. I know there are still open blockers and it's early in the process in a way, but I'd like to find out where we are. Please run the test script, let me know the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans
2017 Jul 21
27
[PATCH v2 00/23] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml.
v1 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html This series now depends on two small patches which I posted separately: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html v1 -> v2: - Previously changes to generator/daemon.ml were made incrementally through the patch