search for: av1

...rature per day, with 180 days. I want to find the average temperature of each day. I am able to do this one by one, but with that many days to calculate the average for, it will get very long. I'm sure there is a faster way to do this, I just don't know how. What i have so far is: av1 <- subset(ER9r, Day == 98, select = c (Depth1j:Depth0.75j)) av1 <- mean(av1 [av1>0]) av2 <- subset(ER9r, Day == 99, select = c (Depth1j:Depth0.75j)) av2 <- mean(av2 [av2>0]) av3 <- subset(ER9r, Day == 100, select = c (Depth1j:Depth0.75j)) av3 <- mean(av3 [av3>0]) av4 &...

...re you get your life on it. > Just my 2c worth. > > Best Regards, > Silvia. > > On 2 Oct. 2017 9:46 am, "Raphael Canut" <nhwcodec at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Just a very quick message. > > I have seen the results of the last version of AOM AV1 on this page: > http://wyohknott.github.io/image-formats-comparison/ , and AOM AV1 is now > exceptional! -What I also like is that it has a good neatness-.The NHW > Project can not compete.The only advantage of the NHW Project is that it is > ultra fast, ultra low-power consumption (and...

...15 quality setting whereas files size is smaller.I notably find this new -l16 quality setting better than x265 (HEVC). More at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ We can still save 2.5KB per .nhw compressed file. I however know that this work is hopeless because the industry will soon standardize AOM AV1 (AVIF) as the new image compression codec.I have also read on twitter that the new JPEG XL standard will be based on AOM AV1.I could not test AOM AV1 but I guess that if the Alliance for Open Media never answered me it's because AOM AV1 is better than the NHW Project. Anyway I wanted to remind...

...19.0, 18.6, 22.8, 19.4, 18.8, 19.2, 19.8, 21.4, 22.8, 21.3) df = data.frame(r, e, y) attach(df) par(mfrow=c(2,1)) interaction.plot(r, e, y, col = 'blue', ylab = 'y', xlab = 'r') interaction.plot(e, r, y, col = 'blue', ylab = 'y', xlab = 'r') av1 = aov(y ~ r*e) av2 = aov(y ~ r/e) efR_E = summary(av2, split = list('r:e' = list('e1 vs e2/r1' = 1, 'e1 vs e2/r2' = 2, 'e1 vs e2/r3' = 3))) av3 = aov(y ~ e/r) efE_R = summary(av3, split = list('e:r' = list('r/e1' = c(1,3), 'r/e2' =...

WebP (imagepart of VP9) is better then JPG AVIF (imagepart of VPX/AV1) is better then HEIF please support in OPUS file for album arts more then JPG and PNG... WebP and AVIF are free imageformats can store multiple images thats good for the problem with METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE only can store one file. i try to push some devs of player and converter to support this t...

Hello, I don't have advanced on the NHW codec, but now, as a lot of people, I am following the AOMedia AV1 codec.Just a (late) update of my previous post, there won't be problem in AOM AV1 with the CABAC scheme, as the codec will use Daala's multi-symbol entropy coder and/or ANS.That's great! I have even read on the wiki page, that AV1 will use Daala's PVQ as quantization scheme.Wow. Al...

...19.0, 18.6, 22.8, 19.4, 18.8, 19.2, 19.8, 21.4, 22.8, 21.3) df = data.frame(r, e, y) attach(df) par(mfrow=c(2,1)) interaction.plot(r, e, y, col = 'blue', ylab = 'y', xlab = 'r') interaction.plot(e, r, y, col = 'blue', ylab = 'y', xlab = 'r') av1 = aov(y ~ r*e) av2 = aov(y ~ r/e) efR_E = summary(av2, split = list('r:e' = list('e1 vs e2/r1' = 1, 'e1 vs e2/r2' = 2, 'e1 vs e2/r3' = 3))) av3 = aov(y ~ e/r) efE_R = summary(av3, split = list('e:r' = list('r/e1' = c(1,3), 'r/e2' =...

...19.0, 18.6, 22.8, 19.4, 18.8, 19.2, 19.8, 21.4, 22.8, 21.3) df = data.frame(r, e, y) attach(df) par(mfrow=c(2,1)) interaction.plot(r, e, y, col = 'blue', ylab = 'y', xlab = 'r') interaction.plot(e, r, y, col = 'blue', ylab = 'y', xlab = 'r') av1 = aov(y ~ r*e) av2 = aov(y ~ r/e) efR_E = summary(av2, split = list('r:e' = list('e1 vs e2/r1' = 1, 'e1 vs e2/r2' = 2, 'e1 vs e2/r3' = 3))) av3 = aov(y ~ e/r) efE_R = summary(av3, split = list('e:r' = list('r/e1' = c(1,3), 'r/e2' =...

Hello, I know there is no community around NHW, but I would have liked to know what you would like to see improved in the NHW codec.I know its results are not perfect for now compared to high-end AV1/VVC codecs for example, but could be ok giving its extremely fast speed.-However on high quality images, I notably like its good results because of its neatness.- Regarding things to improve, there is the problem of aliasing, I have started some quick experiments as I mainly find that aliasing app...

...--- On Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:59:34 -0700 Raphael Canut <nhwcodec at gmail.com> wrote ---- Hello, I know there is no community around NHW, but I would have liked to know what you would like to see improved in the NHW codec.I know its results are not perfect for now compared to high-end AV1/VVC codecs for example, but could be ok giving its extremely fast speed.-However on high quality images, I notably like its good results because of its neatness.- Regarding things to improve, there is the problem of aliasing, I have started some quick experiments as I mainly find that...

...t(rep(letters[1:6], 4)) #auxiliary variable df = data.frame(df, aux) attach(df) par(mfrow = c(2, 1)) interaction.plot(r, e, y, col = 'blue', ylab = 'y', xlab = 'r') interaction.plot(e, r, y, col = 'blue', ylab = 'y', xlab = 'r') av1 = aov(y ~ r*e) av2 = aov(y ~ r/e) efR_E = summary(av2, split = list('r:e' = list( 'e1 vs e2/r1' = 1, 'e1 vs e2/r2' = 2, 'e1 vs e2/r3' = 3))) av3 = aov(y ~ e/r) efE_R = summary(...

...Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:59:34 -0700 Raphael Canut <mailto:nhwcodec at gmail.com> wrote ---- Hello, I know there is no community around NHW, but I would have liked to know what you would like to see improved in the NHW codec.I know its results are not perfect for now compared to high-end AV1/VVC codecs for example, but could be ok giving its extremely fast speed.-However on high quality images, I notably like its good results because of its neatness.- Regarding things to improve, there is the problem of aliasing, I have started some quick experiments as I mainly find that al...

...; <nhwcodec at gmail.com <nhwcodec at gmail.com>>* wrote ---- > > Hello, > > I know there is no community around NHW, but I would have liked to know > what you would like to see improved in the NHW codec.I know its results are > not perfect for now compared to high-end AV1/VVC codecs for example, but > could be ok giving its extremely fast speed.-However on high quality > images, I notably like its good results because of its neatness.- > > Regarding things to improve, there is the problem of aliasing, I have > started some quick experiments as I mainl...

Hi, I would know how to plot two variograms on a same graph. I can plot one by one but I would draw both on the same one. Is it possible? Do i need any special package? Thanks! Cordialement Damien Landais

Hello, Ok that's right HEVC and AOM AV1 are better than the NHW codec, even at mid compression.I only tested my codec with quite neat images, hence the good results, but on more blurred, more compressed images, HEVC and AOM AV1 are definitely better, they are also exceptionnal at high compression. So, yes that's right, the NHW codec...

...Update at: http://nhwcodec.blogspot.com/ I am also working on -l6 quality setting, I can simply increase quantization for it but I am not totally satisfied with this solution for now... Looking for more advanced processing at these compression ratios, like an efficient denoising, as do HEVC, AOM AV1,... Cheers, Raphael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora/attachments/20180416/46d2fd7a/attachment.html>

...ar(mfrow=c(2,1)) interaction.plot(dF$r, dF$e, dF$y, col = 'blue', ylab = 'Y', xlab = 'R') interaction.plot(dF$e, dF$r, dF$y, col = 'blue', ylab = 'Y', xlab = 'R') # ANOVAs av0 = aov(y ~ tra, data=dF) summary(av0) av1 = aov(y ~ r*e, data=dF) summary(av1) av2 = aov(y ~ r/e, data=dF) e_r = summary(av2, split = list('r:e' = list( 'e1 vs e2/r1' = 1, 'e1 vs e2/r2' = 2, 'e1 vs e2/r3' = 3))) e_r av3 = aov(y ~ e/r, data=dF) r_e = summary(av3, split = list('e:r' =...

...dF = data.frame(a, b, tra, y) # Graphic par(mfrow=c(2,1)) interaction.plot(dF$a, dF$b, dF$y, ylab = 'y', xlab = 'a') interaction.plot(dF$b, dF$a, dF$y, ylab = 'y', xlab = 'b') # ANOVAs av0 = aov(y ~ tra, data=dF) summary(av0) av1 = aov(y ~ a*b, data=dF) summary(av1) av2 = aov(y ~ a/b, data=dF) b_a = summary(av2, split = list('a:b' = list( 'b1 vs b2/a1' = 1, 'b1 vs b2/a2' = 2, 'b1 vs b2/a3' = 3))) b_a av3 = aov(y ~ b/a, data=dF) a_b = summary(av3, split = list('b:a' =...

Hello, Just a quick message to correct what I have said in my previous post.It finally seems not that easy to code small wavelet coefficients to have a good precision, and SPIHT is certainly a very good algorithm for that, -and I know there are SPIHT experts that can make very good SPIHT-based codecs-.I have chosen a new and different approach, the multistage residual coding, so I will try to

...HW codec and x265 are on par, sometimes more neatness is better, sometimes more precision is better, and a lot of improvements remain to be done for the NHW codec. If there are engineers from mobile device companies on this forum, could you consider the NHW Project or is it too late it will be AOM AV1 or HEVC despite their high power consumption? Monty, would it be possible that the NHW Project has a Xiph.org page to encourage and boost its development? Any answer welcome! Cheers, Raphael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org...