search for: auxilary

...>> For this c code(see attachments) cl, mingw and clang produce different >> coff's(was used dumpbin with option /ALL): >> 1) Cl generate separate COMDAT section with linkage selection "pick any" >> 2) Mingw place this value to regular section and place special auxilary >> record to symbol table >> 3) Clang without patch just ignore weakness of this value and place it to >> regular section. >> But for weak values without explicit section specification it use cl-like >> way. i.e. generate >> separate COMDAT section with a...

...(see attachments) cl, mingw and clang produce different >>>> coff's(was used dumpbin with option /ALL): >>>> 1) Cl generate separate COMDAT section with linkage selection "pick any" >>>> 2) Mingw place this value to regular section and place special auxilary >>>> record to symbol table >>>> 3) Clang without patch just ignore weakness of this value and place it >>>> to >>>> regular section. >>>> But for weak values without explicit section specification it use >>>> cl-like >&...

...el Spencer > > For this c code(see attachments) cl, mingw and clang produce different > coff's(was used dumpbin with option /ALL): > 1) Cl generate separate COMDAT section with linkage selection "pick any" > 2) Mingw place this value to regular section and place special auxilary > record to symbol table > 3) Clang without patch just ignore weakness of this value and place it to > regular section. > But for weak values without explicit section specification it use cl-like > way. i.e. generate > separate COMDAT section with a little difference in nami...

...ee attachments) cl, mingw and clang produce different >>> coff's(was used dumpbin with option /ALL): >>> 1) Cl generate separate COMDAT section with linkage selection "pick >>> any" >>> 2) Mingw place this value to regular section and place special auxilary >>> record to symbol table >>> 3) Clang without patch just ignore weakness of this value and place >>> it to >>> regular section. >>> But for weak values without explicit section specification it >>> use cl-like >>> way. i.e. gene...

...ents) cl, mingw and clang produce different >>>>> coff's(was used dumpbin with option /ALL): >>>>> 1) Cl generate separate COMDAT section with linkage selection "pick any" >>>>> 2) Mingw place this value to regular section and place special auxilary >>>>> record to symbol table >>>>> 3) Clang without patch just ignore weakness of this value and place it >>>>> to >>>>> regular section. >>>>> But for weak values without explicit section specification it use >>&...

...variables. theta <- c(theta_1, theta_2) h <- t <- 1/52 # time between observations ## creating state space representation of 2-factor CIR model follwing Driessen and Geyer et al. CIR2ss <- function(K_1, K_2, sigma_1, sigma_2, lambda_1, lambda_2, theta_1, theta_2) { ## defining auxilary parameters phi_11 <- sqrt((K_1+lambda_1)^2+2*sigma_1^2) phi_21 <- sqrt((K_1+lambda_2)^2+2*sigma_2^2) phi_12 <- K_1+lambda_1+phi_11 phi_22 <- K_2+lambda_2+phi_12 phi_13 <- -2*K_1*theta_1/sigma_1^2 phi_23 <- -2*K_2*theta_2/sigma_2^2...

...this? > > - Michael Spencer For this c code(see attachments) cl, mingw and clang produce different coff's(was used dumpbin with option /ALL): 1) Cl generate separate COMDAT section with linkage selection "pick any" 2) Mingw place this value to regular section and place special auxilary record to symbol table 3) Clang without patch just ignore weakness of this value and place it to regular section. But for weak values without explicit section specification it use cl-like way. i.e. generate separate COMDAT section with a little difference in naming (unique suffix after...

...# is the length of the observed sample d <- nrow(x) # is the number of observed variables. h <- 1/52 ## creating state space representation of 2-factor CIR model CIR2ss <- function(K_1, K_2, sigma_1, sigma_2, lambda_1, lambda_2, theta_1, theta_2, delta_0, delta_1, delta_2) { ## defining auxilary parameters, phi_11 <- sqrt((K_1+lambda_1)^2+2*sigma_1^2*delta_1) phi_21 <- sqrt((K_2+lambda_2)^2+2*sigma_2^2*delta_2) phi_12 <- K_1+lambda_1+phi_11 phi_22 <- K_2+lambda_2+phi_21 phi_13 <- 2*K_1*theta_1/sigma_1^2 phi_23 <- 2*K_2*theta_2/sig...

Hi All, For quite some time there's been a side project for developing an AVR back end for LLVM: http://sourceforge.net/projects/avr-llvm/ What is required from us to be able to add this work to the LLVM repo? And when do you think would be a good time for us to do that? If this is located somewhere in the docs and I've missed it, pointers would certainly be appreciated. Thanks, Eric

...ot; ldap ssl = no ldap delete dn = Yes ---- [root@mitosis /]$/usr/bin/ldapsearch -D "cn=Directory Manager" -b "cn=Schema" objectclass=*|grep sambaSamAccount Bind Password: objectClasses=( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.2.2.6 NAME 'sambaSamAccount' DESC 'Samba 3.0 Auxilary SAM Account' STRUCTURAL MUST ( uid $ sambaSID ) MAY ( cn $ sambaLMPassword $ sambaNTPassword $ sambaPwdLastSet $ sambaLogonTime $ sambaLogoffTime $ sambaKickoffTime $ sambaPwdCanChange $ sambaPwdMustChange $ sambaAcctFlags $ displayName $ sambaHomePath $ sambaHomeDrive $ sambaLogonScript $ samb...

...fn(a, y); leftval = accept_prob_fn(a, -theta + node[current_pos+2]); rtval = accept_prob_fn(a, theta + node[current_pos+2]); denom = fmax2(leftval, rtval); /* function in Rmath which returns max of two doubles */ p = num/denom; assert(p>=0 && p <=1); return p; } /* auxilary function for accept_prob */ double accept_prob_fn(double a, double y) { double f; if(y != 0) f = (exp(y) - exp(-y))/(y*exp(a*y)); else f = 2; return f; }

...RidBase' DESC 'Base at which the samba RID generation algorithm should operate' EQUALITY integerMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 SINGLE-VALUE ) objectclass ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.2.2.6 NAME 'sambaSamAccount' SUP top AUXILIARY DESC 'Samba 3.0 Auxilary SAM Account' MUST ( uid $ sambaSID ) MAY ( cn $ sambaLMPassword $ sambaNTPassword $ sambaPwdLastSet $ sambaLogonTime $ sambaLogoffTime $ sambaKickoffTime $ sambaPwdCanChange $ sambaPwdMustChange $ sambaAcctFlags $ displayName $ sambaHomeP...

Hello All, I have a problem with my roaming profiles where they are becoming too large due to the Thunderbird mail accounts (stored by default) in Application Data. What I would like to do is exclude this directory from being part of the roaming profile. How can I do this? Also, how hard is it to have some users not use a roaming profile but others continuing to use a roaming profile? We

>From the little I have heard about control systems for cars, which was some years ago, they were blockhead proprietary. The analogy would only work if computing was customarily blackbox technology, which it isn't. I'd be surprised if there were any branded flash drives that contained less than their advertised amount of storage. That leaves the question of what is going on under the

...P cases sensistive? Which should it be? Has anyone got an updated schema for iPlanet Directory Server 5.1? Here's my start to the conversion. Any help greatly appreciated. Darren --- objectClasses: ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.2.2.6 NAME 'sambaSamAccount' SUP top AUXILIARY DESC 'Samba 3.0 Auxilary SAM Account' MUST ( uid $ sambaSID ) MAY ( cn $ sambaLMPassword $ sambaNTPassword $ sambaPwdLastSet $ sambaLogonTime $ sambaLogoffTime $ sambaKickoffTime $ sambaPwdCanChange $ sambaPwdMustChange $ sambaAcctFlags $ displayName $ sambaHomePath $ sambaHomeDrive $ sambaLogonScript $ sambaProfilePa...

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:56:17AM +0100, Mark Ballard wrote: > > This is incredible, Mr Sandeen. You mean USB flash manufacturers > (what's their body - the USB Implementer's Forum?) have simply not > provided a means for software to query the underlying hardware in a > USB flash? Have software producers asked them for this? No, they haven't. And yes we have, since

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:55 AM, r4start <r4start at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all. > > While compiling next code > @A = weak unnamed_addr constant { i32, i32, i32 } { i32 0, i32 0, i32 0 }, > section ".data" > was discovered that llc ignores weak linkage if we emit it in COFF object. > Attached patch solves this problem, please review. > > I found some

Hi all. While compiling next code @A = weak unnamed_addr constant { i32, i32, i32 } { i32 0, i32 0, i32 0 }, section ".data" was discovered that llc ignores weak linkage if we emit it in COFF object. Attached patch solves this problem, please review. I found some similar tests in test/Objects/Inputs. Should I do something like trivial.ll checking or there is a better way to check

Hello, all. I'm afraid I've been dropped into the deep end even though I am an Asterisk novice. I've set up a few tiny, tiny systems in the past and have now been asked to pull together Asterisk, FreePBX, Kamailio, RTPProxy, and Fedora Directory Server into a VoIP service. After googling and reading for most of the last 24 hours, I finally have my head around the components and how

I'm trying to set up my LDAP in preparation to configure my Samba PDC. In the Official Samba-3 HOWTO and Reference Guide it give instructions on howto setup slapd.conf (section 10.4.4.3) After modifying the file it instructs to run /sbin/splapindex -f /splapd.conf When I run this I get the following error: /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema: line 423: AttributeType not found: