search for: autuvb4

I'm am currently using autuvb4 at q-2 mono 44100. This produces roughly 28 to 34kb/s. It's ok but I've heard AACPlus at 32kb/s stereo and it's definately better, unfortunately. Regards, Ross. >> I'm hoping that Monty and others can improve Vorbis to start >> competing >> with AAC+ at low...

> hmmm.. very interesting.. any info on how they've done the licensing ? No idea how the licensing works. If it's free for the streamer then that may destroy Vorbis's inroads into streaming. I'm hoping that Monty and others can improve Vorbis to start competing with AAC+ at low bitrates. Monty said he had some ideas but I wonder if anything is being worked on presently.

...s even more competitive codecs at dialup speeds. Jay -----Original Message----- From: icecast-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:icecast-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Ross Levis Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 9:47 PM To: icecast Subject: Re: [Icecast] AACPlus Shoutcast v1.90 I'm am currently using autuvb4 at q-2 mono 44100. This produces roughly 28 to 34kb/s. It's ok but I've heard AACPlus at 32kb/s stereo and it's definately better, unfortunately. Regards, Ross. >> I'm hoping that Monty and others can improve Vorbis to start >> competing >> with AAC+ at low...

...t;karl@xiph.org> To: "Ross Levis" <ross@stationplaylist.com> Cc: "icecast" <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:18 AM Subject: Re: [Icecast] AACPlus Shoutcast v1.90 On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 03:47, Ross Levis wrote: > I'm am currently using autuvb4 at q-2 mono 44100. This produces > roughly > 28 to 34kb/s. It's ok but I've heard AACPlus at 32kb/s stereo and > it's > definately better, unfortunately. I wasn't really thinking about 32kb/s modes as I find them poor anyway, but I haven't heard much at the lowe...