search for: autotools

Hi everyone, TL;DR I plan to do subj unless anyone objects. Autotools support for building sanitizers was never complete, is a proper subset of CMake capabilities, and the gap between the features of CMake build and autotools is quickly increasing: 1) OS: autotools support Linux, Mac OS X and Android; CMake also supports FreeBSD and Windows. 2) Architectures: autotoo...

Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on Makefile/autoconf build or add the support for sanitizer testing. Anna. > On Feb 17, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > +1 (...

> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: > Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. > > The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on Makefile/autoconf build or add the support for sanitizer testing. > > Sorry, for some reason I had the impression that you're also more interested in CMak...

...4:00 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com <mailto:vonosmas at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. >> >> >> The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on Makefile/autoconf build or add the support for sanitizer testing. >> >> >> Sorry, for some reason I had the impression...

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 27 June 2016 at 07:00, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >> Building with CMake sets the version-string correct whereas using >> autotools as build-system does not. > > Hi Sedat, > > This was reported earlier and it's unfortunate, but we don't support > autotools build any more. The official releases are made using CMake > and most of the buildbots are using it. > > Feel free to apply a patch on top of...

Hello all, I am a beginner of LLVM and want to add a new Target for LLVM. I follow the document (http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html) to modify autotools/configure.ac. However when I type ./AutoRegen.sh There is an error that "Your autoconf was not detected as being 2.60" I download the source of autoconf 2.60 and install it. And there is the other error that "Your aclocal was not detected as being 1.9.6". Now I don't know...

Good morning, Lu. You may do; 1) build and install certain autotools with --prefix=/path/to/your/autotools 2) run the line; PATH=/path/to/your/autotools/bin:$PATH autoconf/AutoRegen.sh Good luck! ...Takumi

Hi, Here is a proposal for adding CMake in addition of Autotools. See the attached patch for changes or the pull request here: https://github.com/xiph/opus/pull/100 The CMake scripts are parsing the filelist from Autotools, so only one file list needs to be maintained. With this change the checked in Visual Studio solution can be removed and no longer need...

Below is a repost of the message I sent about the strange error message I was getting when trying to build my project on CentOS. I am a software developer and don't have time to compare distros. I am also not an autotools expert. The autotools files in my project were lmade by others. It builds on everything except CentOS. I also don't have the time to build a simple test case. That would probably be time-consuming. The only thing I can do is explain how to reproduce the error. However, this would be time-c...

...lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> On 27 June 2016 at 07:00, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Building with CMake sets the version-string correct whereas using >>> autotools as build-system does not. >> >> Hi Sedat, >> >> This was reported earlier and it's unfortunate, but we don't support >> autotools build any more. The official releases are made using CMake >> and most of the buildbots are using it. >> >> Feel...

You saw my previous message about a strange error. I've tried many times to get autotools working on CentOS. It's the only distro in which I have had problems. How do i bring this to the attention of those who make the decisions? Thanks, John -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing...

...tarball if it exists so it should maintain the version info. //Marcus ________________________________ From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 11:38 To: Marcus Asteborg; opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] CMake support for Opus proposal (in addition to Autotools) Thanks, it applies now. I think you'd also want to add some (all?) of these files to EXTRA_DIST in Makefile.am, otherwise your cmake files won't be included in release tarballs, which are generate using "make dist". To test, you should try running run "make dist" to ge...

...ged the name to avoid conflict. Attached is the updated patch. //Marcus ________________________________ From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 00:07 To: Marcus Asteborg; opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] CMake support for Opus proposal (in addition to Autotools) Hi Marcus, There seems to be a conflict between the autotools-created config.h.in and the same file added by your patch. Any way you can use use a different name? Cheers, Jean-Marc On 04/02/2019 01:39 AM, Marcus Asteborg wrote: > Hi, > > > Here is a proposal for adding CMa...

...tion, which I think is a bit unexpected for most users. I don't know how to do that in cmake, but it would be good to default to a "release" build with optimizations. Can you have a patch to do that? Also, is there a way to manually add flags to the compiler (like setting CFLAGS with autotools)? Cheers, Jean-Marc On 04/02/2019 07:15 PM, Marcus Asteborg wrote: > Right that I had completely missed, I have added the files and verified > that it builds with CMake from the tar on Linux (out of the git repo) > > I am parsing the package_version file from the tarball if it exis...

When I see one book about llvm and choose the building method between autotools, cmake, and ninja building methods, I was confused. Is there any link about this content? Thanks for reply. -- My best regards to you. No System Is Safe! mudongliang

...------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 2, 2019 00:07 > *To:* Marcus Asteborg; opus at xiph.org > *Subject:* Re: [opus] CMake support for Opus proposal (in addition to > Autotools) >   > Hi Marcus, > > There seems to be a conflict between the autotools-created config.h.in > and the same file added by your patch. Any way you can use use a > different name? > > Cheers, > >         Jean-Marc > > On 04/02/2019 01:39 AM, Marcus Asteborg wro...

On 11/28/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > I think the amount of Windows crap is getting a bit ridiculous. Does > anyone know of a solution to keep things manageable? I mean, the same > autotools files manage the build for Linux PCs, Blackfins and MacOS (and > others). Yet, we need one set of files for each MS compiler version > (good thing they don't practice "release early, release often"). There > has to be some simpler solution. Anyone? Well, you could use Mingw...

...a's config.log: >checking for iconv... yes >checking for working iconv... yes >checking how to link with libiconv... -liconv The Fedora negative results came from the latest master, 1.3.6. The OS X tests were on an effectively an older version of the code [1], but I think this is an autotools issue in common to both version. So...any ideas? I thought this linking error was the kind of thing the autotools were supposed to catch. --Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/attachments/20120625/...

...IX) set(LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX "") endif() ... [ llvm.src/autoconf/configure.ac ] ... AC_INIT([LLVM],[3.8.0],[http://llvm.org/bugs/]) LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR=3 LLVM_VERSION_MINOR=8 LLVM_VERSION_PATCH=0 LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX= ... Building with CMake sets the version-string correct whereas using autotools as build-system does not. - Sedat -

Hi folks! I'm trying to convince autotools to allow me to include fish.c in a C file containing a bunch of unit tests. In order to do that I need to convince it add include path (-I../) to gcc for that particular file (test-quoting.c originally, but dash seems to make troubles as well). I came up with this (snippet from Makefile.am): bi...