search for: autotooled

Hi everyone, TL;DR I plan to do subj unless anyone objects. Autotools support for building sanitizers was never complete, is a proper subset of CMake capabilities, and the gap between the features of CMake build and autotools is quickly increasing: 1) OS: autotools support Linux, Mac OS X and Android; CMake also supports FreeBSD and Windows. 2) Architectures: autotools support i386 and x86_64,

Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on Makefile/autoconf build or add the support for sanitizer testing. Anna. > On Feb 17, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > > +1 (in case you still need mine) > > On Thu, Feb 12,

> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: > Unfortunately, we do rely on the Autotools to build for darwin. > > The lack of proper testing is very unfortunate. In the future, we will either drop the dependency on

On 18/02/2015 23:29, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at apple.com <mailto:ganna at apple.com>> wrote: > > >> On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com <mailto:vonosmas at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Anna Zaks <ganna at

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 27 June 2016 at 07:00, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >> Building with CMake sets the version-string correct whereas using >> autotools as build-system does not. > > Hi Sedat, > > This was reported earlier and it's unfortunate, but we don't support

Hello all, I am a beginner of LLVM and want to add a new Target for LLVM. I follow the document (http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html) to modify autotools/configure.ac. However when I type ./AutoRegen.sh There is an error that "Your autoconf was not detected as being 2.60" I download the source of autoconf 2.60 and install it. And there is the other error that "Your

Good morning, Lu. You may do; 1) build and install certain autotools with --prefix=/path/to/your/autotools 2) run the line; PATH=/path/to/your/autotools/bin:$PATH autoconf/AutoRegen.sh Good luck! ...Takumi

Hi, Here is a proposal for adding CMake in addition of Autotools. See the attached patch for changes or the pull request here: https://github.com/xiph/opus/pull/100 The CMake scripts are parsing the filelist from Autotools, so only one file list needs to be maintained. With this change the checked in Visual Studio solution can be removed and no longer need to be maintained and updated when

Below is a repost of the message I sent about the strange error message I was getting when trying to build my project on CentOS. I am a software developer and don't have time to compare distros. I am also not an autotools expert. The autotools files in my project were lmade by others. It builds on everything except CentOS. I also don't have the time to build a simple test case. That

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> On 27 June 2016 at 07:00, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Building with CMake sets the version-string correct whereas using >>> autotools as build-system

You saw my previous message about a strange error. I've tried many times to get autotools working on CentOS. It's the only distro in which I have had problems. How do i bring this to the attention of those who make the decisions? Thanks, John -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing

Right that I had completely missed, I have added the files and verified that it builds with CMake from the tar on Linux (out of the git repo) I am parsing the package_version file from the tarball if it exists so it should maintain the version info. //Marcus ________________________________ From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 11:38 To: Marcus

Hi, Thanks for the quick feedback I have changed the name to avoid conflict. Attached is the updated patch. //Marcus ________________________________ From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 00:07 To: Marcus Asteborg; opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] CMake support for Opus proposal (in addition to Autotools) Hi Marcus, There seems to be a conflict

Hi, It looks like cmake currently defaults to no optimization, which I think is a bit unexpected for most users. I don't know how to do that in cmake, but it would be good to default to a "release" build with optimizations. Can you have a patch to do that? Also, is there a way to manually add flags to the compiler (like setting CFLAGS with autotools)? Cheers, Jean-Marc On

When I see one book about llvm and choose the building method between autotools, cmake, and ninja building methods, I was confused. Is there any link about this content? Thanks for reply. -- My best regards to you. No System Is Safe! mudongliang

Thanks, it applies now. I think you'd also want to add some (all?) of these files to EXTRA_DIST in Makefile.am, otherwise your cmake files won't be included in release tarballs, which are generate using "make dist". To test, you should try running run "make dist" to generate a tarball yourself. From there, you try building the contents with your cmake files and see if

On 11/28/07, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > I think the amount of Windows crap is getting a bit ridiculous. Does > anyone know of a solution to keep things manageable? I mean, the same > autotools files manage the build for Linux PCs, Blackfins and MacOS (and > others). Yet, we need one set of files for each MS compiler version > (good thing they

Hello all, I've been testing hivexml in OS X, and came across an inconsistency in building. Some while back, I hit a snag with iconv in OS X, where basically this would happen when a hive of any sophistication (greater than hivex/images/small) was processed: >$ xml/hivexml images/large >test.xml >dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _iconv_open > Referenced from:

> Can you answer my question on how to set the version-string correct > when generating tarballs out of the release_38 Git branch? > ( I generated source-tarballs out of my local Git repositories, see below. ) [ llvm.src/CMakeLists.txt ] ... if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR) set(LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR 3) endif() if(NOT DEFINED LLVM_VERSION_MINOR) set(LLVM_VERSION_MINOR 8) endif() if(NOT

Hi folks! I'm trying to convince autotools to allow me to include fish.c in a C file containing a bunch of unit tests. In order to do that I need to convince it add include path (-I../) to gcc for that particular file (test-quoting.c originally, but dash seems to make troubles as well). I came up with this (snippet from Makefile.am): bin_TESTS = testquoting testquoting_CFLAGS = -I../