search for: automove

Dear All, I was wondering if this is possible: I am using namespaces to support my environment which has legacy mboxes and new maildirs. In it looks like: namespace private { separator = / inbox = yes prefix = location = maildir:/home/virtual/%d/home/%n/Maildir/ } namespace private { separator = / prefix = mail2/ inbox = yes hidden = yes location =

...iscussion fodder: Have the buildbots (or, probably better, one Master Buildbot) do auto- reversion when they see a new failure. They would need to be able to detect bogus failures, such as temporary inability to connect to the svn server. Have checkins go to a branch, and have the buildbots automove them into mainline only after passing regression checks on the branch. If the procedures go wrong I can easily imagine the tree getting into a state where nobody knows what's in it very quickly, so we need to be careful...

We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang) recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly. I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four hours. We would like for the testing bots to begin working again. Thanks, stuart

...y better, one Master Buildbot) do >> auto- >> reversion when they see a new failure. They would need to be able to >> detect bogus failures, such as temporary inability to connect to the >> svn server. >> >> Have checkins go to a branch, and have the buildbots automove them >> into mainline only after passing regression checks on the branch. >> >> If the procedures go wrong I can easily imagine the tree getting into >> a state where nobody knows what's in it very quickly, so we need to >> be >> careful... >> > &g...

...uildbot) do >>> auto- >>> reversion when they see a new failure.  They would need to be able to >>> detect bogus failures, such as temporary inability to connect to the >>> svn server. >>> >>> Have checkins go to a branch, and have the buildbots automove them >>> into mainline only after passing regression checks on the branch. >>> >>> If the procedures go wrong I can easily imagine the tree getting into >>> a state where nobody knows what's in it very quickly, so we need to >>> be >>> caref...

...the buildbots (or, probably better, one Master Buildbot) do auto- > reversion when they see a new failure. They would need to be able to > detect bogus failures, such as temporary inability to connect to the > svn server. > > Have checkins go to a branch, and have the buildbots automove them > into mainline only after passing regression checks on the branch. > > If the procedures go wrong I can easily imagine the tree getting into > a state where nobody knows what's in it very quickly, so we need to be > careful... > I'm not too keen about seein...