search for: autolinks

At Sony we offer autolinking as a feature in our ELF toolchain. We would like to see full support for this feature upstream as there is anecdotal evidence that it would find use beyond Sony. In general autolinking (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-linking) allows developers to specify inputs to the linker in their source code. LLVM and Clang already have support for autolinking on ELF via

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:32 PM Peter Smith <peter.smith at linaro.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I've put some comments on the proposal inline. Having to had to debug > library selection problems where all the libraries are visible on the > linker command line, I would prefer if people didn't embed difficult > to find directives in object files, but I'm guessing in

...t >>> file appears in the link? I'm imagining the case where you have a >>> statically linked libc as well as a libbar.a autolinked from a foo.o. The >>> link command line would look like this: >>> >>> ld foo.o -lc >>> >>> Now foo.o autolinks against bar. The command line becomes: >>> >>> ld foo.o -lc -lbar >>> >> >> Actually, I was thinking that on a GNU linker the command line would >> become "ld foo.o -lc -( -lbar )-"; but, this doesn't affect your point. >> >> &g...

...need to appear at the point immediately after the object file appears > in the link? I'm imagining the case where you have a statically linked libc > as well as a libbar.a autolinked from a foo.o. The link command line would > look like this: > > ld foo.o -lc > > Now foo.o autolinks against bar. The command line becomes: > > ld foo.o -lc -lbar > Actually, I was thinking that on a GNU linker the command line would become "ld foo.o -lc -( -lbar )-"; but, this doesn't affect your point. > > If libbar.a requires an additional object file from libc.a...

...imagining the case where you have a >>>>> statically linked libc as well as a libbar.a autolinked from a foo.o. The >>>>> link command line would look like this: >>>>> >>>>> ld foo.o -lc >>>>> >>>>> Now foo.o autolinks against bar. The command line becomes: >>>>> >>>>> ld foo.o -lc -lbar >>>>> >>>> >>>> Actually, I was thinking that on a GNU linker the command line would >>>> become "ld foo.o -lc -( -lbar )-"; but, this doe...

...;>>>> statically linked libc as well as a libbar.a autolinked from a foo.o. The >>>>>>> link command line would look like this: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ld foo.o -lc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now foo.o autolinks against bar. The command line becomes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ld foo.o -lc -lbar >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually, I was thinking that on a GNU linker the command line would >>>>>> become &qu...

...;>>>> statically linked libc as well as a libbar.a autolinked from a foo.o. The >>>>>>> link command line would look like this: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ld foo.o -lc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now foo.o autolinks against bar. The command line becomes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ld foo.o -lc -lbar >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Actually, I was thinking that on a GNU linker the command line would >>>>>> become &qu...

...as well as a libbar.a autolinked from a foo.o. The >>>>>>>>> link command line would look like this: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ld foo.o -lc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now foo.o autolinks against bar. The command line becomes: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ld foo.o -lc -lbar >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually, I was thinking that on a GNU linker the command line &...

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:28 AM Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I guess I agree it would be best to remove the objfile linker option > support and replace it with just auto-linking. We already have a mechanism > for adding new features to object files: .note sections. Linkers already > know to ignore ones that they don't

...sible" autolinked inputs. OTOH why not allow command line options to affect the autolinked inputs? It gives developers some more control at no cost (apart form the possible confusion). > > The other option is to handle autolinked libraries as soon as we find > them, so that if foo.o autolinks libbar, the linker would act as if foo.o > in the command line is followed by -lbar. I'd think that's not too bad or > arguably more straightforward semantics than autolinking everything all at > once at the end. > So I played around with this idea a bit. Some background info:...

...foo.o. The >>>>>>>>>>> link command line would look like this: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ld foo.o -lc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Now foo.o autolinks against bar. The command line becomes: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ld foo.o -lc -lbar >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Actually, I was thinking...

...line options to >> affect the autolinked inputs? It gives developers some more control at no >> cost (apart form the possible confusion). >> >> >>> >>> The other option is to handle autolinked libraries as soon as we find >>> them, so that if foo.o autolinks libbar, the linker would act as if foo.o >>> in the command line is followed by -lbar. I'd think that's not too bad or >>> arguably more straightforward semantics than autolinking everything all at >>> once at the end. >>> >> >> So I played ar...

Hi, Is there a way to have markdown automatically convert obvious (http, mailto) URL's to links? i.e: http://example.com -> <a href="http://example.com>http://example.com</a> Thanks, -- http://www.critikart.net

I am trying to do a tutorial improvement on the wiki but I am having some problems with the auto formatting. Using httdp.conf produces http://httpd.conf when filtered. Using *.so produces .so and bold text there after. Is there any shorthand for the user for making text appear as it should without the linking and re-writes? Or does the admin have to change the filters in Instiki? Tesla

Hi, folks. I was wondering if any of you could point me in the right direction. Using R 3.3.3 (and later), on an IBM Power LPAR, Red Hat 7 PPC64le, markdown build fails as below. > install.packages("markdown") trying URL 'https://cloud.r-project.org/src/contrib/markdown_0.8.tar.gz' Content type 'unknown' length 80583 bytes (78 KB)

Hi, This is more of a Ruby question than Rails. I want to autolink url''s in a given string. I''m not great with regular expressions and I wandered if anybody has an example. Thanks.

Hey everybody! -------------- webgen 0.5.11 has just been released! If you don''t know what webgen is, read the "What''s webgen?" section down below. This announcement is also available at http://webgen.rubyforge.org/news/release_0_5_11.html In this release there are two big changes regarding the internals of webgen: 1. The dependency on facets has been removed

I'm trying to add a new option to clang to enable my auto profile pass. I've added this to Options.td and Driver/Tools.cpp, but I'm not getting the option -auto-profile in cc1's invocation. I've checked that the code to push -auto-profile is executed, but if use -v, I don't see -auto-profile in the cc1 invocation. Can anyone point me to some document that explains how to

On 9 June 2015 at 07:55, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> wrote: > <significant snippage> > > Call me picky but I'd rephrase > The CentOS Project ONLY provides updates or other changes for the > latest version of each major branch. > to > The CentOS Project provides updates or other changes ONLY for the > latest version of each major

...so it makes sense for compatibility's sake to allow it in PHP Markdown too. [half]: http://babelmark.bobtfish.net/?markdown=This+is+%5Bmy+website%5D.%0D%0A%09%09%0D%0A%5Bmy+website%5D%3A+http%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2F%0D%0A&src=1&dest=2 * Now accepting many valid email addresses in autolinks that were previously rejected, such as: <abc+mailbox/department=shipping at example.com> <!#$%&'*+-/=?^_`.{|}~@example.com> <"abc at def"@example.com> <"Fred Bloggs"@example.com> <jsmith@[192.0.2.1]> * Now accepting spaces in U...