search for: autocrat

...> the printer, right? After I figured it out, I wrote a detailed blog post about the subject. http://blog.microlinux.fr/hplip-centos/ Cheers, Niki PS: on a side note, I wanted to discuss this subject on the CentOS Facebook group, but got blocked by their admin who seems to be the local pet autocrat. Links to CentOS-specific blog posts are disallowed as well as technical questions, so I wonder what this group is good for. Probably discussing the weather while running CentOS... -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microl...

Hi, There are currently two competing CentOS groups on Facebook. The "main" group is managed by a small group of autocrats with very unilateral communication skills. The other one is not managed at all, judged by the amount of non-CentOS-related stuff published there (Ubuntu tutorials, Windows games, cheap Ray-Ban sunglasses). I was a bit frustrated by this state of things, the more so since I've successfully man...

...centos at centos.org> >> Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 15:48:29 >> Subject: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook > >> Hi, >> >> There are currently two competing CentOS groups on Facebook. The >> "main" group is managed by a small group of autocrats with very >> unilateral communication skills. The other one is not managed at >> all, judged by the amount of non-CentOS-related stuff published >> there (Ubuntu tutorials, Windows games, cheap Ray-Ban sunglasses). >> >> I was a bit frustrated by this state of things...

> PS: on a side note, I wanted to discuss this subject on the CentOS Facebook group, > but got blocked by their admin who seems to be the local pet autocrat. Try centos.org/forums instead. I tend to avoid wiki sites to which I'm not allowed to contribute; maybe you'd feel like jumping through their hoops, though. i.e. see item 3 at wiki.centos.org/Contribute

...entOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Sunday, 8 October, 2017 15:48:29 > Subject: [CentOS] New CentOS/RHEL group on Facebook > Hi, > > There are currently two competing CentOS groups on Facebook. The "main" > group is managed by a small group of autocrats with very unilateral > communication skills. The other one is not managed at all, judged by the > amount of non-CentOS-related stuff published there (Ubuntu tutorials, > Windows games, cheap Ray-Ban sunglasses). > > I was a bit frustrated by this state of things, the more so since...

...fire in ONE location. On 6/7/07, Frank Tanner III <pctech at mybellybutton.com> wrote: Okay, lets try to contain this to ONE forum (mailing list) please. > See... Your whole response to my whole firewall document thing is EXACTLY why I didn't post it on your wiki. Because you are autocratic. Some community. Someone tries to GIVE to the community and the community shits on them. You had this exact same problem last year when you did this as well. Einstein defined insanity as someone performing the same actions and expecting differing results. > For the record, in less that 24...

Le 21/04/2017 ? 17:32, m.roth at 5-cent.us a ?crit : > Is there a .ppd for the printer in /etc/cups/ppd? Or is there a CUPS print > server on another system (we have all ours basically go through one > server). # ls /etc/cups/ppd/ Officejet_Pro_8600.ppd This is a network-attached printer. All other desktop clients (Slackware) have CUPS + HPLIP running and can print and scan. Only the

...ipedia, shows no real "democracy", even the pure Athenian version that few Americans (except maybe some Californians) would recognize. Without actual rule by all of its contributors and readers, but rather primary rule by many policies determined and (often) enforced by people selected by autocrats (however benevolent), it's no democracy, but rather a collegiocracy or something else with a new name. Digium/Asterisk is an interesting example. For example, the community has so far accepted the proprietary ownership of code contributed to Digium, but a tension in source code openness lies...

...ay want to add the following feature, proffered below, in order to conduce a little greater batch mode usage flexibility primarily for those with above average security concerns. Currently (at least in the current, official, stable rsync version), batch mode may only be utilized in a fairly rigid, autocratic, master pushes to slaves mode. Therefore, at least among those slaves with the necessary minutia in place to allow the master to copy batch mode filesets to them and perform remote command execution on them at all, the slaves (like true slaves) have no choice but to make the changes that have be...

Hi all, The underlying assumption of membership in any community is that your participation is at worst neutral, and if possible positive. Communities, online or off, generally do what they can to protect themselves from detrimental influences, which is where policies, politeness, moderators, and all that come into play. Puppet''s community has been both fortunate and awesome,