Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "autoconfy".
Did you mean:
autoconf
2012 Jun 21
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...at's not good enough.
I want to add support for --compress-debug-sections to the assembler.
That means that I'd like to add a new optional dependency (on zlib) to
llvm, and couldn't. The problem is that I can't run AutoRegen.sh even
after searching for the right versions of all the autoconfy bits.
Debian has a "snapshot" server with every version of every package
they've ever had, and even that failed me; I found autoconf 2.59 and
2.61, but no 2.60.
>From my point of view, that's a crisis. I'm sure we'll figure
something out, but right now I'm thinking...
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
On Jun 20, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote:
> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement?
>
> If
2012 Jun 21
27
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet?
Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay
around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent
enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features
from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement?
If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it!
Nick
-------------- next part