search for: autoconfy

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "autoconfy".

Did you mean: autoconf
2012 Jun 21
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
...at's not good enough. I want to add support for --compress-debug-sections to the assembler. That means that I'd like to add a new optional dependency (on zlib) to llvm, and couldn't. The problem is that I can't run AutoRegen.sh even after searching for the right versions of all the autoconfy bits. Debian has a "snapshot" server with every version of every package they've ever had, and even that failed me; I found autoconf 2.59 and 2.61, but no 2.60. >From my point of view, that's a crisis. I'm sure we'll figure something out, but right now I'm thinking...
2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
On Jun 20, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement? > > If
2012 Jun 21
27
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet?
Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement? If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it! Nick -------------- next part