search for: autoconfisc

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "autoconfisc".

Did you mean: autoconfig
2004 Sep 10
5
autoheader failing?
With these versions: ii autoconf 2.54-2 automatic configure script builder ii automake1.6 1.6.3-2 A tool for generating GNU Standards-complian I am unable to build the autoconfiscations. autoheader gives: autoheader2.50: error: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS not found in configure.in What versions are you using? (btw, I do think it would be a very good idea to start using AC_CONFIG_HEADERS instead of passing so many of -D's on the compiler command line) -- - mdz
2004 Sep 10
2
autoheader failing?
(btw, after mangling all the autoconfiscations to use config.h, autoheader works for me...) On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:16:13PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > (btw, I do think it would be a very good idea to start using > > AC_CONFIG_HEADERS instead of passing so many of -D's on the compiler > > command line) >...
2002 Sep 13
1
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
...> > Ok, I'll switch to that from the placeholder "LINUX". > > > >(better yet) whether the system has a valid <stdint.h>? > > > Nope. Autoconf is definitely the way to go here (even though converting > > is a pain). > > Agreed. We plan to autoconfiscate LLVM eventually, but it won't get > started for quite some time. In the meantime, the #ifdef __linux__ hack > should be sufficient. > > Thanks for the help, > > -Chris > > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ > http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/ > > ________________...
2002 Sep 13
3
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
Chris Lattner wrote: >>ISSUE: INT64_MAX undefined in InstrSelectionSupport.cpp and >>InstructionCombining.cpp. I'm not completely sure where INT64_MAX comes >>from on Solaris, but C99 says that INT64_MAX is defined in stdint.h, >>but, for C++, only if __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS is #defined. Solaris (at >>least in CSIL) unfortunately does not have stdint.h, but it does
2004 Sep 10
0
autoheader failing?
--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > With these versions: > > ii autoconf 2.54-2 automatic configure script builder > ii automake1.6 1.6.3-2 A tool for generating GNU > Standards-complian > > I am unable to build the autoconfiscations. autoheader gives: > > autoheader2.50: error: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS not found in configure.in > > What versions are you using? > $ autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.53 $ automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.6.3 how did you get the 'dash' number in th...
2004 Sep 10
0
autoheader failing?
--- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote: > (btw, after mangling all the autoconfiscations to use config.h, > autoheader > works for me...) > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 11:16:13PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: > > > > (btw, I do think it would be a very good idea to start using > > > AC_CONFIG_HEADERS instead of passing so many of -D's on the >...
2002 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
...> we are on a Linux box with stdint.h. Ok, I'll switch to that from the placeholder "LINUX". > >(better yet) whether the system has a valid <stdint.h>? > Nope. Autoconf is definitely the way to go here (even though converting > is a pain). Agreed. We plan to autoconfiscate LLVM eventually, but it won't get started for quite some time. In the meantime, the #ifdef __linux__ hack should be sufficient. Thanks for the help, -Chris http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/
2003 Aug 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Status Update
...the Illinois Open Source License (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/UoI-NCSA.php), which is an OSI approved license similar in spirit to the BSD license. This is good for us, because now the barriers to the release are purely technical, not political. :) :) 2. John has LLVM completely autoconfiscated, which makes the system dramatically easier to set up and use! He and Dinakar also wrapped up the "Projects" system, which allows loosely connected LLVM projects to be built outside of the LLVM tree, while making use of all of the makefile machinery we already have. 3. B...