Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "auto_tie_break".
Did you mean:
auto_tie_breaker
2018 Jul 07
1
two 2-node clusters or one 4-node cluster?
...te A (in this case possibly I will disable
some less critical services or tolerate degraded performances)
In this case the configuration in my case would be (not tested yet):
quorum {
provider: corosync_votequorum
expected_votes: 4
last_man_standing: 1
auto_tie_breaker: 1
}
Note that it is applied only on node loss and not when a node leaves the
cluster in a clean state, for which there is the "allow_downscale" option
that seems not fully supported at this moment.
Cheers,
Gianluca
2018 Jul 05
5
two 2-node clusters or one 4-node cluster?
Hello,
I'm planning migration of current two clusters based on CentOS 6.x with
Cman/Rgmanager going to CentOS 7.x and Corosync/Pacemaker.
As the clusters and their services are on the same subnet, and there no
particular security concerns differentiating them, I'm also evaluating the
option to transform the two clusters into a unique 4-node one during the
upgrade.
Currently I'm