search for: authoritarianism

...the opposition to systemd. When people go to Mac they accept what it is (mostly). That's a fundamentally different culture to Linux (or BSD for that matter). > For an init system to gain sufficient momentum, it must be the default, with no easy way to avoid it. That's an argument for authoritarianism, which seems to me to be anathema to the overriding culture of Linux. Can you see why many people might dislike the personalities involved with systemd, yet, when such an argument is used in favour of systemd? :-) >> I should add that the speaker also massively over-simplifies opposition &gt...

On Oct 17, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: > > launchd is not being forced on them as systemd is in practice Try doing without launchd on macOS. If you think that?s irrelevant, count the number of MacBooks at the next FreeBSD conference you attend. For an init system to gain sufficient momentum, it must be the default, with no easy way to

...rful general purpose scripting language mandated by POSIX three decades after it was released by AT&T. We?ve got better alternatives here, too.) >> For an init system to gain sufficient momentum, it must be the default, with no easy way to avoid it. > > That's an argument for authoritarianism I call it leadership. Working code argues best. Benno Rice is right: Lennart Poettering gets stuff done. In the BSD world, they call the opposite tendency bikeshedding. You can find a thousand people willing to argue about why something shouldn?t be done, or why it shouldn?t be done *that* way...

On 25.06.2020 01:19, Fedor Sergeev via llvm-dev wrote: > On 6/21/20 10:41 PM, Ivan Kush via llvm-dev wrote: >> Yes, broad. But what guys say: "You LLVM developers are all racists, because you use 'master' word" >> Or broader: "You  all developers are all racists, because you use 'master' word". We are not racists, but other guys think so. >>

...pose scripting language mandated by POSIX three decades after it was released by AT&T. We?ve got better alternatives here, too.) > >>> For an init system to gain sufficient momentum, it must be the default, with no easy way to avoid it. >> >> That's an argument for authoritarianism > > I call it leadership. Working code argues best. > > Benno Rice is right: Lennart Poettering gets stuff done. > > In the BSD world, they call the opposite tendency bikeshedding. You can find a thousand people willing to argue about why something shouldn?t be done, or why i...

After upgrading to 1.7.0 under debian linux, I can't get e1071 working properly. The first problem I had was that g++-3.0 was the standard compiler but wasn't installed, so I installed it. e1071 then installed correctly, but I get the following: aperrin at perrin:~/afshome/papers/authoritarian/R$ R R : Copyright 2003, The R Development Core Team Version 1.7.0 (2003-04-16) R is free

Greetings. I'd like to generate a graph that displays two distributions as side-by-side bar graphs, then plots a smoothed line of the distribution on top. The idea is to be able to visually compare the distributions. I've done the following, but the axes don't line up. Any suggestions? barplot(table(hcd.df$datecat, hcd.df$auth.sum), beside=TRUE,

On 05/05/2016 11:42 AM, C Bergström via llvm-dev wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:55 AM C Bergström <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> Chandler - I do not want to derail, hijack or change the topic of this >>> discussion - Would you be ok with me going into specific

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:55 AM C Bergström <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Chandler - I do not want to derail, hijack or change the topic of this > discussion - Would you be ok with me going into specific examples? > IMO, no, I don't think that would be a productive direction. I also suspect it would have a high probability of (unintentionally) leading to exactly the

On 13 October 2015 at 17:16, Kuperstein, Michael M via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > The FreeBSD CoC is, IMHO, much better in this respect ( https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html ). Nice! This is so succinct and beautiful! It doesn't need an overseeing foundation to take opaque decisions, and focus on what's really important: the code. I

Hi, Is rails supposed to support referential integrity? That is rails either support to be able to ensure that when a new contact is created this can only happen if a valid suberb is associated with it, and which mechanisms of the below are supposed to do this? (a) using DB foreign key constraints information as a basis? (b) using the "has_one" line in the model file to enfore? If

> From: Philippe Grosjean > > Duncan, > > I agree totally with you on all points, now that we clarified our > respective ideas. I am afraid I probably agree also with your last > point, from a theoretical point-of-view ("I still think we need more > glue and am working on that while we continue to experiment with the > design of GUIs for the next 5 years