search for: authentications

Hi I am experimenting with Constructor based dependency injection for rails controllers. So I have something like this class LoginSessionsController < ApplicationController def initialize(authenticator = TheRealAuthenticator) @authenticator = authenticator end .... end The plan was to override the authenticator used when testing with something like describe

On 05/08/2019 08:24, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai, > > I think this is an old bug.. ( pretty sure about it ) > And i suggest to dont change anything except smb.conf. > > Your trying to use kerbereros usersname. > wbinfo -a marcio at EMPRESA.COM.BR > Enter marcio at EMPRESA.COM.BR's password: > > And you using: > winbind use default domain = yes >

Hi all, I'm setting a mailserver using dovecot version: 2.1.7. On the server I have a couple of system users using PAM authentication and a lot of virtual users using SQL authentication. When a virtual user (e.g. david at virtdomain.de) logs in dovecot tries to authenticate the user via PAM and after failing it uses SQL: Mar 19 11:39:42 orange dovecot: auth-worker(7815): pam(david at

I need to allow [read] access to a Samba server using both IP filtering & UserIDs . For a given list of IP subnets, any user should have access. Outside these 'trusted' subnets, I need to do User authentication. I can handle the User authentication OK in several ways. However, I don't see any way to do the 'short circuit' allow for some IPs, then use User authentication

Hi, I?ve posted this before but no one was able to help. I can?t figure out what they are trying to do, and if I should be concerned. I am running dovecot version 0.99.14 on Fedora Core 4. It appears that my dovecot server is under attack. This morning in my system e-mail I saw this: dovecot: Authentication Failures: rhost= : 23431 Time(s)

...ticated_so_far = 0; /* Indicate that authentication is needed. */ packet_start(SSH_SMSG_FAILURE); *************** *** 371,376 **** --- 376,404 ---- break; } + /* + * If we require both RSA host and some other authentication + * check that we've obtained two distinct authentications. + */ + if ( options.rsa_host_other_authentication && authenticated ) { + if ( type == SSH_CMSG_AUTH_RHOSTS_RSA ) { + authenticated_so_far |= AUTH_RSA_HOST ; + } + else { + authenticated_so_far |= AUTH_OTHER ; + } + + if ( authenticated_so_far == AUTH_BOTH ) { +...

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: maandag 5 augustus 2019 9:59 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] problems with authentication > > On 05/08/2019 08:24, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > > Hai, > > > > I think this is an old bug..

I had similar problems when my auth.php was on password protected http server...but after applying the following configuration i've got it working: <mount> <mount-name>/Test</mount-name> <authentication type="url"> <option name="listener_add" value="http://user:pass@127.0.0.1/auth/action.php"/> <option

Hi all I'm not sure whether to go to the ppp lists for this, or the samba lists. I thought I'd try here first. I have a linux firewall using winbind to authenticate users coming in with PPTP. It all seemed to work OK at first. After a while I noticed that authentication was denied to users who had previously (as in less than a day) authenticated successfully. After a day or so of

There has been some good discussion around our IBM security team as to what actually constitutes SSH multi factor authentication. There are 2 options being discussed. One, the Google Authenticator (OTP authentication). Two, Public/Private key authentication (pubkeyauthentication = yes) which supports pass phrase private key authentication. Which of these is considered multi-factor

P.S. Test 1, was done with an backend = AD Just verified the other (older) proxy. Debian Jessie, samba 4.8.12. ( also a proxy server ) Same result, all work great :-) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > L.P.H. van Belle via samba > Verzonden: maandag 5 augustus 2019 10:08 > Aan: samba at

Hello, We're starting to use FreeIPA in house (which is awesome btw) which means that Kerberos and TLS client certificate authentication is suddenly quite easy. Im looking for a list of common Linux services with data on how one can Authenticate/Authorise for these services. * httpd support TLS client certificate authentication and Kerberos * rabbitmq supports TLS client certificate

Hi, I was looking into the new Authentication Policy feature: https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Policy I had kinda hoped that I would be able to enfore this in a proxy running in front of several backends. This proxy does not authenticate. It use "nopassword". But I realize that the "succes" reported in the final authpolicy req. (command=report) is not what is

I'd like to commit the following patch which adds a new option to the htpasswd client authenticator. This option <option name="allow_duplicate_users"> specifies wether or not the same username can connect to a mountpoint more than once. This is pretty much a required feature for any decent use of the listener authentication capabilities of icecast. thoughts ? comments ?

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz.sig I should have released this earlier since v1.1.6 had that annoying startup problem, but surprisingly few people complained about it so I kind of forgot about it then. BTW. v1.2 progresses nicely. Now that shared mailboxes are finally fully supported, there aren't any widely used IMAP

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/dovecot-1.1.7.tar.gz.sig I should have released this earlier since v1.1.6 had that annoying startup problem, but surprisingly few people complained about it so I kind of forgot about it then. BTW. v1.2 progresses nicely. Now that shared mailboxes are finally fully supported, there aren't any widely used IMAP

I'm trying to get to the bottom of an issue with key authentication on AIX and I'm not sure I believe IBM's answer so I thought I'd post here to see what answer I'd get from the SSH side. We have three different methods of authentication - local, VAS (AD), NIS. On our Linux and Solaris servers it's very simple to set the authentication order with nsswitch.conf and SSH

There are situations in which access to one's home directory depends on prior authentication. Here are several: - AFS (requires Kerberos-based tokens) - NFSv4+GSSAPI (requires a Kerberos TGT) - encrypted home directories (requires a token/password to decrypt) As it stands right now, OpenSSH X11 authentication forwarding breaks in these scenarios. This is because unlike the approach

I have the following problem: # wbinfo -V Version 3.0.24 # wbinfo -a anyuser%goodpassword plaintext password authentication succeeded challenge/response password authentication succeeded # wbinfo -a anyuser%badpassword plaintext password authentication failed error code was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD (0xc000006a) error messsage was: Wrong Password Could not authenticate user anyuser%badpassword

I am attempting to access the in-built LDAP backend to use for authentication for an external web app. When connecting to the server, an error is returned "Strong(er) authentication is required (8) for user" Google suggests that this is due to the fact that simple authentication is not enabled on the LDAP server. This web app, however, does not support SASL. So, is it possible to