search for: authenitcation

I am writting a web service for authenitcation of users and was using web_service_scaffold :invoke for testing it out...and was able to consume it using .NET. But my question is, whats the simplest method using which i can use the same web service in the current Web App. I mean, not from an external application or something but from the cur...

I have a Red Hat Linux release 7.1 (Seawolf) Samba 2.2.4 PDC and fileserver built with --with-ldapsam. The clients are either win9x or WinY2k. Authenitcation, etc... all works great. But print sharing is a real pain. Under 2.2.1a printing worked great, but our VOIP phone system wouldn't joint the domain until we upgraded to 2.2.4. Initial testing of 2.2.4 made it seem like everything worked. But eventually WinY2k users can't print, they sim...

I have been studing the OpenSSH code, and am looking to use it in an envriornment with untrusted local users. I have some patches to this effect, which I will post to the list in due course. In any case, I would like all users who sucessfully authenitcate to leave their mark in the system logs, in particular utmp and wtmp. As these logs mean didily-squat without unique terminal names (and

...#39;m perfectly content to write my own solution if needed, but I have no clue how to go about accessing Samba's LDAP information to read/write. If someone could either point me to a solution that would fix this for me, or at least point me to where I can read up on what the expected schema and authenitcation rules are, I'd appreciate it a great deal. Thanks all! -- Dan Egli >From my Test server

I want to vary the path rsync uses based on the user that authenitcated to the module. I can see doing this in one of two ways: 1) Append the username that was used for the connection to the path string of the module on the fly. What was /path/to/dir is now /path/to/dir/username 2) Append the username into the dest_path that was sent from the other side. The effect of this would do the same

Lets talk about SIP and IAX2 1. The good and bad of both 2. What is the better one and why 3. and any other information that maybe use full -- Best regards, Al Bochter Bochter Services (Voip PBX) Toll Free: 866-638-1254 EXT: 250 (Voip PBX) Free World DialUp: 780217 EXT: 250 (Voip) Cellular: 712-432-5401 http://www.BochterServices.com/?t=Email BUY and sell Coins, Silver and Gold

Hi... I have 2 samba servers..... Samba1 and Samba2 All my win9x boxes will authenitcate and login to Samba1.... thus using Samba1's netlogon login.bat script.... In this script, is a command that maps a drive letter to a share on Samba2 I also have a command that maps a different drive letter to a share on Samba1 If the win9x box reboots and logs in.... all commands in the login.bat work...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there any good reason to run Winbind on an Samba LDAP PDC? I've never used winbind before and I'm wondering if there is a reason I should consider learning. I suppose one would be better server debugging. Jim C. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

...ines do not get this.) I did add the [profiles.V2} copy = profiles Hoping this might be the fix. Still no joy. I can paste my smb.conf if any thinks it would help. Bottom line is my smb.conf works fine thwith XP & 2000 but not Vista. I have done the reg hack of allowing lesser than" NTLMv2 authenitcation on a couple of the Vista boxes so I can test with them. I am wondering if this is still dns releated?,,,hhmmm. lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) Oct 12 18:52:59 wcfile smbd[14114]: getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connecte 2007/10/12 18:52:59, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write...

Hi All! Thanks to all of you that responded to my previous posts. I've gotten a lot more info now than I used to have! But I still have questions. The biggest right now is: Is there a way build up a Samba PDC as a direct replacement for an existing Windows NT 4.0 PDC? All the material I've found to date is written from a standpoint of creating a new domain as you create the Samba

When I try the command nmblookup -M TESTGROUP querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1 localhost