search for: auhtor

Hello, I use Shorewall 2.0.16 on my server. I would like to auhtorized some external desktop to connect my network. The desktop''s IP change always, because they use dynamic addresses and they haven''t static IP. So I would like to filter those desktop...With shorewall, I can use an IP to drop, reject...But in my case, I can use it. So I think to u...

...y the entire first frame, and continue encoding. This avoids that the first data you feed in must share its bits with the preceeding zeros, and you get a more compact encoding. (this might matter if you have a lot of short samples). This all sounds like a bad hack, and actually it is. What do the auhtor(s) of SPEEX think, can this be considered as a bug and be fixed? I ran into this problem and it took me a while to work around it, and I can observe on the internet that other people have problems with this too. If you encode 1000 samples, and then decode 1000 samples, you expect to get the same 1...

...d continue encoding. This avoids that the first > data you feed in must > share its bits with the preceeding zeros, and you get a more compact > encoding. > (this might matter if you have a lot of short samples). > > This all sounds like a bad hack, and actually it is. What do the auhtor(s) > of SPEEX think, > can this be considered as a bug and be fixed? > > I ran into this problem and it took me a while to work around it, and I can > observe > on the internet that other people have problems with this too. > If you encode 1000 samples, and then decode 1000 sam...

...but not necessarily everyone else. > > This seems like the place where XFAIL would help you and everyone else. If > the original test failure was XFAILed immediately, the bot would go green, > then red again if a new failure was introduced. Not only would you know, but > so would the auhtor of the change. I agree in principle. I just worry that it's a lot easier to add an XFAIL than to remove it later. Though, it might be just a matter of documenting the common behaviour and expecting people to follow through. cheers, --renato

Folks, David has been particularly militant with broken buildbots recently, so to make sure we don't throw the baby with the bath water, I'd like to propose some changes on how we deal with the emails on our *current* buildmaster, since there's no concrete plans to move it to anything else at the moment. The main issue is that managing the buildbots is not a simple task. It requires