search for: augustsson

I'm using configure. On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> writes: > >> Commenting out the Hello transformation I get these link errors: >> >> llvm[2]: Linking Debug Shared Library LTO.dll >> c:/DOCUME~1/1312888/Desktop/Workspace/llvm/llvm-top/Debug/lib/libLLVMSystem.a(Signals.o): >> In fun...

Hi, Is there some documentation about what has not been implemented yet? I'm trying to use vectors and I just run into one thing after another that seem to be missing. (I.e., fcmp on vectors doesn't work; trying to do the same thing with expanded instructions doesn't work; select on a vector doesn't work) -- Lennart

On Jan 24, 2009, at 4:34 AM, Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there some documentation about what has not been implemented yet? I've started adding notes to docs/LangRef.html Historically this document has been used to describe just the LLVM IR, and not what specific consumers of it do...

Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> writes: > Commenting out the Hello transformation I get these link errors: > > llvm[2]: Linking Debug Shared Library LTO.dll > c:/DOCUME~1/1312888/Desktop/Workspace/llvm/llvm-top/Debug/lib/libLLVMSystem.a(Signals.o): > In function `Z28LLVMUnhandledE...

...:/DOCUME~1/1312888/Desktop/Workspace/llvm/llvm-top/lib/System/Win32/DynamicLibrary.inc:116: undefined reference to `_imp__EnumerateLoadedModules at 12' -- Lennart On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 8, 2009, at 4:21 AM, Lennart Augustsson wrote: > >> Like this: >> >> llvm[1]: Compiling Signals.cpp for Debug build >> In file included from Signals.cpp:33: >> Win32/Signals.inc:262: error: `sys' has not been declared >> Win32/Signals.inc: In function `void AddSignalHandler(void (*) >> (vo...

Lennart Augustsson mentioned on his blog that he got substantial performance improvements by conveying to LLVM when external functions (e.g. tanh) were pure. How is this done? -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e

...www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xcu/cp.html, "Second synopsis") Also, and this might be a separate bug, note how openssh exits with return code of 1. This was verified using various versions of scp from 3.6.1p2 to 4.2, on linux (various versions) and openbsd. /August. -- Bj?rn Augustsson Sysadmin IT Systems & Services Chalmers tekniska h?gskola Chalmers University of Technology "Damn spooky analog crap." -- John Carmack.

...e KillSigs, KillSigsEnd, and RegisterHandler undefined. If I didn't know better I'd think someone had committed code without compiling first. :) -- Lennart On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > On Sunday 08 March 2009 01:42:42 Lennart Augustsson wrote: >> I'm trying to compile the top version of LLVM with MinGW, but I'm >> getting compilation errors. > > What kind of errors? > > Ciao, > > Duncan. >

Hi, > Lennart Augustsson mentioned on his blog that he got substantial performance > improvements by conveying to LLVM when external functions (e.g. tanh) were > pure. first note that tanh is not pure, because the result depends on the current floating point rounding mode. However, if you are willing to sacrifice...

On Tuesday 17 February 2009 09:46:07 Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi, > > > Lennart Augustsson mentioned on his blog that he got substantial > > performance improvements by conveying to LLVM when external functions > > (e.g. tanh) were pure. > > first note that tanh is not pure, because the result depends on the current > floating point rounding mode. Ugh. > However...

I'm trying to compile the top version of LLVM with MinGW, but I'm getting compilation errors. They seem to be caused by the changes in rev 66072. Has anyone compiled on MinGW? Since I just installed MinGW on this computer it could be my problem. (I noticed that LLVM 2.5 still doesn't come with binaries for the libraries on MinGW.) -- Lennarft

On Sunday 08 March 2009 01:42:42 Lennart Augustsson wrote: > I'm trying to compile the top version of LLVM with MinGW, but I'm > getting compilation errors. What kind of errors? Ciao, Duncan.

On Tuesday 13 October 2009 04:02, Lennart Augustsson wrote: > And you really want your allocas in the entry block so they are > implemented by just stack pointer manipulation rather than calling > alloca(). The latter is slower, and there's also a bug that makes > calling alloca() not getting the alignment right (if it's > 8)....

...ler work then you might like to use Gordon's > OCaml bindings to LLVM that are bundled with LLVM. They are very easy to use > and will make subsequent work vastly easier than trying to write everything > in C++. Or, indeed, the Haskell bindings I've been working on with Lennart Augustsson. They're both safer and easier to use than the OCaml bindings :-) <b

Is there a guide anywhere to embedding LLVM into a program to compile and run a DSEL? Thanks, Sean

On Mar 8, 2009, at 4:21 AM, Lennart Augustsson wrote: > Like this: > > llvm[1]: Compiling Signals.cpp for Debug build > In file included from Signals.cpp:33: > Win32/Signals.inc:262: error: `sys' has not been declared > Win32/Signals.inc: In function `void AddSignalHandler(void (*) > (void*), void*)': > Win32/S...

Are there any imminent plans to extend the C API to make it more complete? Or should I just make a bug report with patches for the calls that I need that are missing? -- Lennart

Hi, > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:07 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: >> Are there any implicit assumptions about where alloca instructions >> can appear. > > Static allocas should appear as a continuous chunk in the entry block, > otherwise other passes might make bad assumptions. an alloca can appear anywhere, but when they are outside the entry block then

And you really want your allocas in the entry block so they are implemented by just stack pointer manipulation rather than calling alloca(). The latter is slower, and there's also a bug that makes calling alloca() not getting the alignment right (if it's > 8). On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi, > >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009

On Tuesday 05 February 2008 12:40:20 thomas weidner wrote: > I wanted to roll out my own lisp, and maybe use some library code from > existing lisps (think of loop or format). Adding an LLVM backend to an > existing lisp implementation is a nice idea, but currently not planned. I am also interested in implementing functional programming languages using LLVM. Although I'm only