Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "augpred_lab".
2010 Oct 15
1
Package 'nlme' fails 'make check-all' in R 2.12.0 patched built from source
...can tell, nlme is the only core/recommended package that now has a "Suggests" in the DESCRIPTION file for a non-core/non-recommended package. This Suggests for Frank's Hmisc appears to be new as of version 3.1.-97 of nlme.
A search of the examples/tests for nlme yields an example in augPred_lab.R as follows, which appears to be the only code based reference to Hmisc in the nlme package:
library(nlme)
if(require("Hmisc")) {
T.aug <- Orthodont
label(T.aug$age) <- 'anyL'
foo <- augPred(lme(distance ~ age, random = ~1|Subject, data=T.aug))
## failed...
2015 May 17
0
That 'make check-all' problem with the survival package
...that I found that has such a connection is nlme, which has a Suggests for Frank?s Hmisc. However, based upon a grep review of the package contents, there are only two code based references to Hmisc that I located:
>
>./R/newFunc.R:264:? ? ? ## e.g. Hmisc's "labelled"
>./tests/augPred_lab.R:2:if(require("Hmisc")) {
>
>Neither of which is really needed (the first being a comment only, so benign) and of course the latter goes against the current guidance in R-exts. The second, within the if() code, uses the Hmisc label() function, which it seems to me is not really nee...
2015 May 16
2
That 'make check-all' problem with the survival package
------------------------------
On Sat, May 16, 2015 8:04 AM BST Uwe Ligges wrote:
>Not sure why this goes to R-devel. You just could have asked the
>maintainer. Terry Therneau is aware of it and promised he will fix it.
>
The quickest fix is to add cmprsk to the recommended list , and that's is an R-devel issue.
>On 16.05.2015 07:22, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>> 'make