search for: auep

...em. mgcp debug MUST be on to see the results of this command. *CLI> mgcp audit endpoint 1 << Could not find endpoint >> *CLI> mgcp audit endpoint aaln/1 << Could not find endpoint >> *CLI> mgcp audit endpoint aaln/1@001099008521 Posting Request: AUEP 9 aaln/1@001099008521 MGCP 1.0 F: A to 10.1.22.81:2427 MGCP read: 528 9 Incompatible Protocol Version from 10.1.22.81:2427 Verb: '528', Identifier: '9', Endpoint: 'Incompatible', Version: 'Protocol Version' 1 headers, 0 lines MGCP read: RSIP 1075 aaln/3@[...

...is the criteria to the generation of the transaction identifiers in MGCP? I mean, are they generated by a randomic method? I'm using Asterisk and MGCP eyeP Phone and observed that the RSIP and NTFY (methods created by the gateway) use high values in the transaction identifiers, while the RQNT, AUEP, CRCX and DLCX (by the call agent) use low values for it. I hope I could explain my doubt! Here are some examples: RSIP 18696 aaln/1@tramontina MGCP 1.0 RQNT 8 aaln/1@tramontina MGCP 1.0 AUEP 9 aaln/1@tramontina MGCP 1.0 RSIP 27232 aaln/1@tramontina MGCP 1.0 RQNT 3 aaln/1@tramontina MGCP 1.0 NTFY...

...2727 MGCP RSIP 14831 SHOR_001049007E83@[192.168.1.137] MGCP 1.0 3 0.008096 192.168.0.5 2727 192.168.1.137 2427 MGCP 200 14831 OK 4 0.008150 192.168.0.5 2727 192.168.1.137 2427 MGCP RQNT 7 SHOR_001049007E83@[192.168.1.137] MGCP 1.0 5 0.008186 192.168.0.5 2727 192.168.1.137 2427 MGCP AUEP 8 SHOR_001049007E83@[192.168.1.137] MGCP 1.0 6 0.008267 192.168.0.5 2727 192.168.1.137 2427 MGCP DLCX 9 SHOR_001049007E83@[192.168.1.137] MGCP 1.0 7 0.009226 192.168.0.5 4569 192.168.1.135 4569 IAX2 IAX, source call# 2, timestamp 61056ms HANGUP 8 0.012188 192.168.1.135 4569 192.168.0....

Hi there, I'd like to know if there's any way I can edit the fields asterisk sends in an MGCP response to my devices, without having to mess with the source code. What happens is that asterisk sends an F parameter in an audit endpoint message I don't want it to send. Does anyone know I can solve this? Thanks

...ter racking my brain trying to figure out why the Axxess system was not passing calls to Asterisk when told to do so, I decided to do some packet sniffing between the two. This is what I discovered: (y.y.y.y is the InterTel, x.x.x.x is the Asterisk server.) 4 203195.759 y.y.y.y->x.x.x.x [MGCP] AUEP 11436 line/0@intertel MGCP 1.0 5 203195.760 x.x.x.x->y.y.y.y [MGCP] 510 11436 Unknown verb It looks as if the Axxess is attempting to ask Asterisk for an audit of the lines that are defined, which Asterisk doesn't seem to support. Anyone out there have any experience with this? Any help w...

...4 13:45:12 UTC ssw*CLI> mgcp show endpoints Gateway '0-13-11-82-bd-a.ssw.dominio.net' at 10.30.15.254 (Static) -- 'aaln/1 at 0-13-11-82-bd-a.ssw.dominio.net in 'alberti' is idle ssw*CLI> mgcp audit endpoint aaln/1 at 0-13-11-82-bd-a.ssw.dominio.net Posting Request: AUEP 3 aaln/1 at 0-13-11-82-bd-a.ssw.dominio.net MGCP 1.0 NCS 1.0 F: A to 10.30.15.254:2427 MGCP read: 200 3 OK A: a:PCMU;PCMA;G728;G729;G729E;G726-16;G726-24;G726-32;G726-40, p:10-30, b:19-100, e:on, t:1, s:off, v:L;fxr;rg;xal;x-xl;fm;lcs;sst;x-jc;x-pol;xrm, m:sendrecv;sendonly;recvonly;inactive;n...

Hi, After spending some time trying to get a DG-104S working behind NAT, I finally found the problem. I made the incorrect assumption that nat=yes in mgcp.conf works just like sip.conf. The channels within a gateway are treated more closely to zap channels than sip channels (from a .conf standpoint). What this means is that you have to put nat=yes BEFORE any subchannel definitions: This

I've been trying to figure this one out for a while, but to no avail. I have my cisco ubr924 setup for MGCP with Asterisk as the call-agent. I have manually registered the endpoint in mgcp.conf. When I pick up the phone, I get no dialtone and debug shows errors. IOS on the ubr924 is 12.2. Any help is appreciated. from mgcp.conf: [ubr924] host=65.37.86.203 context = from-sip (just as a

I'm trying to link up Cisco MGCP-enabled router (residential gateway) with Asterisk, and it looks like some sort of protocol mismatch, could it be MGCP 0.1 vs 1.0? Look at this (x.x.x.99 is the router, x.x.x.98 is Asterisk): MGCP read: NTFY 2 aaln/0@voip-gw1 MGCP 0.1 X: 0 O: hd from 192.168.154.99:2427MGCP read: NTFY 2 aaln/0@voip-gw1 MGCP 0.1 X: 0 O: hd from 192.168.154.99:2427Verb: