search for: att00001

Hello, when I try to install Xen-Tools using the xs-tools.iso I get the error: Errors were encountered while processing: /mnt/visostore/Linux/xe-guest utilities_0.5.0-579_i386.deb I used the xs-tools. iso present in the installation CD XCP and I followed the steps on page 28 (To install the guest agent) of XCP Virtual Machine Installation Guide: I mounted the xs-tools. iso and I executed the

...ization requires the number of elements being shuffle to be equal to the mask size, but it'll probably take some careful testing! Stefanus -- Stefanus Du Toit <stefanus.dutoit at rapidmind.com> RapidMind Inc. phone: +1 519 885 5455 x116 -- fax: +1 519 885 1463 <ATT00001.txt> -- Stefanus Du Toit <stefanus.dutoit at rapidmind.com> RapidMind Inc. phone: +1 519 885 5455 x116 -- fax: +1 519 885 1463 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090...

...eing shuffle to be > equal to the mask size, but it'll probably take some careful testing! > > Stefanus > > -- > Stefanus Du Toit <stefanus.dutoit at rapidmind.com> > RapidMind Inc. > phone: +1 519 885 5455 x116 -- fax: +1 519 885 1463 > > > > <ATT00001.txt> > > -- > Stefanus Du Toit <stefanus.dutoit at rapidmind.com> > RapidMind Inc. > phone: +1 519 885 5455 x116 -- fax: +1 519 885 1463 > > > > <ATT00001.txt> -- Stefanus Du Toit <stefanus.dutoit at rapidmind.com> RapidMind Inc. phone: +1...

hi, --> i have 8cores cpu. but my xenserver is using only one cpu, how to make use of all cpu cores --> machine is having 16G ram but domain0 is having very less memory. is there any way to increase memory for domain0 [root@xenserver-DZONGRI ~]# cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 574464 kB MemFree: 111776 kB Buffers: 9500 kB Cached: 117320 kB SwapCached: 100

...ang > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > > > <ATT00001.txt> > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:...

...st is the best > source I could think of for C++ parsing experience. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > <ATT00001.txt> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090711/9e99004f/attachment.html>

...m.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150908/0655709e/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ATT00001.png Type: image/png Size: 4316 bytes Desc: ATT00001.png URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150908/0655709e/attachment.png>

Dear all, Is anyone aware of any implementation of an inter procedural slicing algorithm for LLVM? I am mostly interested in a static algorithm but a dynamic one can be helpful too. Thanks, Silviu Ganceanu Research Student, Ecole Polytechique Federale de Luasanne -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...f any implementation of an inter procedural slicing > algorithm > for LLVM? I am mostly interested in a static algorithm but a dynamic > one can > be helpful too. > > Thanks, > > Silviu Ganceanu > Research Student, > Ecole Polytechique Federale de Luasanne > <ATT00001.txt> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080815/21d2bda8/attachment.html>

...ble to the path of the subdirectory (relative to llvm/test): % gmake TESTSUITE=Transforms check On 17-Jun-09, at 1:33 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > Does 'make check' allow just running on a particualar directory of > tests ? > > Many thanks in advance, > > Aaron > <ATT00001.txt> -- Stefanus Du Toit <stefanus.dutoit at rapidmind.com> RapidMind Inc. phone: +1 519 885 5455 x116 -- fax: +1 519 885 1463 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090617/1cd0d41...

Does 'make check' allow just running on a particualar directory of tests ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090617/e0dc48e4/attachment.html>

...; could think of for C++ parsing experience.* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> > <ATT00001.txt> > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was s...

Hi How can i enable this feature because: Running /opt/xensource/libexec/mpp-rdac --enable it says: No module mppUpper found for kernel 2.6.32.12-0.7.1.xs1.0.0.298.170582xen, aborting. There is no MPP modules... Terveisin/Regards, Pekka Panula, Sofor Oy - Jatkuvat palvelut _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

....uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > - > Devang > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > <ATT00001.txt>

...> supported? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Nicolas >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > <ATT00001.txt> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091014/6dcdeee2/attachment.html>

Hey Devang, Thanks for the assist, I'm trying to extract a signature which uniquely identifies a block of code.... this is required for a project I am doing. The no of data structures is one of the identifying features of this signature. Thanks Nipun On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Devang Patel <dpatel at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Nipun, > On Oct 30, 2008, at 9:31 PM, Nipun

...eing shuffle to be > equal to the mask size, but it'll probably take some careful testing! > > Stefanus > > -- > Stefanus Du Toit <stefanus.dutoit at rapidmind.com> > RapidMind Inc. > phone: +1 519 885 5455 x116 -- fax: +1 519 885 1463 > > > > <ATT00001.txt> -- Stefanus Du Toit <stefanus.dutoit at rapidmind.com> RapidMind Inc. phone: +1 519 885 5455 x116 -- fax: +1 519 885 1463 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090401/c7b5328...

...about the .llvmbc part? The magic number? >> >> Thanks! >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > *Attachments:* > * ATT00001.txt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200827/0a82a5ff/attachment.html>

Hi everyone, We have noticed that the SROA pass will only eliminate 'alloca' instructions if those are located in the entry basic block of a function. As a general recommendation, should the LLVM IR emitted by our compiler always place 'alloca' instructions in the entry basic block ? (I couldn't find any recommendations concerning this matter.) In addition, we have noticed

Hi Stefanus, Thanks for the info. I still think it's a bug though. Take for example a case where the vectors each have four elements. The values in Mask[] can range from 0 to 7, while HLSMask only has 4 elements. So LHSMask[Mask[i]] can go out of bounds, no? Cheers, Nicolas From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Stefanus Du