search for: atropo

Hi everyone, This is for Xen 2.0.3. I''m really interested in the functionality of atropos (enforcing CPU partitioning in a non work-conserving fashion). As I had reported earlier, atropos seemed broken in 2.0. It still seems broken now: $ xm list Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console Domain-0 0 123 0 r---- 49.1 vm1 1 47...

Hi folks, I''m trying to use the atropos scheduler with Xen. Couple of questions: - the scheduling param *has* to be specified at boot time right, or does Xen allow changing the scheduling scheme at run time?? - xm help atropos gives a very vague message at best, perhaps we could make it more elaborate: xm atropos DOM SLICE PERIOD LAT...

>From tools/libxc/xc_atropos.c: int xc_atropos_domain_set(int xc_handle, u32 domid, u64 period, u64 slice, u64 latency, int xtratime) which takes 6 arguments >From tools/python/xen/xm/main.py: class ProgAtropos(Prog): <snip> def main(self, args): if l...

Hi, I have installed Xen on Linux 2.6.11.10 <http://2.6.11.10> and i am trying to do Asynchronous Direct IO on SAS drives. The application which does the asynchronous direct io on SAS drive is running on Domain 0. Actually the IOPs what i get for a 512Bytes IO size is 67, but if i do the same operation on Linux 2.6.11.10 <http://2.6.11.10> native kernel, i get 267 IOPs.Cananyone

Hi all, With the new vm-tools we are trying to get top like capabilities going correctly. Currently we have a program vm-list that has some of this capability but is dependent on the cpu time given by libxc calls (xc_get_dom_info & xc_domain_get_cpu_usage). These two functions give you how much time (in nanoseconds, why is this not documented) the domain has been actively used. Approaches:

I tried to install and boot a 2.6.7 Dom0 xenLinux Kernel on an SMP (Dual-Xeon) Machine with 2 3-ware Controllers installed (1 4-channel Controler and 1 8-channel Controler, both Parallel ATA) and no other HDs present (except the ones connected to the 3ware controlers, of course). First of all I got a compilation error after activating the SMP option in the kernel config. After deactivating the

I'm sorry if this is documented somewhere.... I certainly couldn't find it though. We are currently using the registry hack to allow unencrypted passwords from our NTsp3+ and 95 clients. We currently have 2 passwords, one considered secure (the Kerberos password - used for UNIX desktop logins and such) and one considered insecure (currently just used for POP and samba - we have no