Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "atomizable".
Did you mean:
abominable
2013 Jul 31
1
[LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] ELF safe/unsafe sections
Can you guys invent a more specific word than "safe" to describe this
concept? The best thing I can come up with is something like "atomizable
section". This is basically describing code and data that the linker
should feel free to strip and reorder, right? I'm not tracking this
closely enough to be totally sure if that's a reasonable word for this.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Shankar Easwaran
<shankare at codeaur...
2013 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] ELF safe/unsafe sections
On 7/30/2013 5:43 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Shankar Easwaran wrote:
>
>> On 7/29/2013 11:24 AM, Nick Kledzik wrote:
>>> On Jul 25, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote:
>>>> Is there any reason -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections wouldn't work? If it'll work, it may be be better to say "if you want to get a better linker
2013 Jul 30
3
[LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] ELF safe/unsafe sections
On Jul 29, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Shankar Easwaran wrote:
> On 7/29/2013 11:24 AM, Nick Kledzik wrote:
>> On Jul 25, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote:
>>> Is there any reason -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections wouldn't work? If it'll work, it may be be better to say "if you want to get a better linker output use these options", rather than defining new ELF