search for: atas

Marcel Moolenaar wrote am 17.03.2008 17:28 (localtime): > > On Mar 17, 2008, at 3:33 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> phk 2008-03-17 10:33:23 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> sys/sys ata.h >> sbin/atacontrol atacontrol.8 atacontrol.c >> sys/dev/ata ata-all.c ata-all.h

I read Ben Rockwood''s blog post about Thumpers and SMART (http://cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=993). Will the SUNWhd package only work on a Thumper? Can I use this on my snv_101 system with AMD 64 bit processor and nVidia SATA?

Surely there must be someone here who can help me with this problem. I have spent weeks trying to get this damned service to work with no luck. I have incoming calls working, but no outgoing. If get outgoing working then incoming don't work. I have sent this problem to this list a couple of times with little or no response, and I _really_ need some help to sort it out. I have an asterisk

I see that there's now a 2.16.1 upgrade path for Cisco ATA-186 devices, dated (variously) July 11 or July 14 2003. Here are some interesting bugs that claim to be fixed. Most notable is CSCeb17953, at least from my perspective, as I've hit this bug before. CSCea42480 The Cisco ATA ignores the Require:100rel header and processes call. CSCea69889 The Cisco ATA builds a 302 Moved

...with asterisk as well. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jay Milk Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 8:16 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage and * (and what about those ATAs?) I asked Vonage innocently about Asterisk integration -- basically explaining that any line that comes in on an ATA (rather than direct to the * server) costs me an extra $80 for an FXO card. Made the statement that I pretty much need to quit my $60/month Vonage habit unless they provide Asteris...

Hi I know that this topic was on the list maybe dozen of times. But I have a question regarding the fax support in asterisk, because all the information I could get does not give me the clear view of if. I read that Asterisk 1.8 will have strong fax (t.38) support, but I want to know if these four scenarios will be possible to achieve: fax machine (phone+fax) connected to ATA --- SPA2102 ATA ---

I have running * without any Digium (or any other) hardware. Now I need to connect analog FAX machine to it. I think that cheapest and easiest way is to buy ATA. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Now, which ATA should I buy? Local dealer sells those four. I can buy something else (if there is any reason for it), but I prefer something of this. One more question, can I plug two lines in any of

Hello, I've got a (P)ATA disk in a special frame. The disk itself supports UDMA-100 (and has an 80-ribbon cable), but the frame isn't compatible with that. By default, FreeBSD negotiates UDMA-100, and the console starts to fill with ICRC errors. In the past, I used a patch to ata-all.c that enabled the following entry in loader.conf to force the disk to UDMA-33, so it worked fine:

To provide a reliable fax solution for users connected to a Asterisk 1.6.2.6 server i have tested a few T.38 capable ATA's: - Patton M-ATA - Grandstream HandyTone 486 - Fritz!Box 7170 I have tried Asterisk 1.6.2.6 compiled with SpanDSP-0.0.6pre17 and also Asterisk 1.6.2.6 with Fax for Asterisk installed. These Asterisk servers are connected to a Cisco PGW 2200 + AS5400XM. Sending fax

Hello, I have been trying to get my coders to work without a conversion. I have read all the available asterisk documentation and support groups without any luck. Here is my issue. (Please feel free to ask questions if you do not understand what I am talking about.) I am using Cisco ATA-186 set to g729 codec. (But it will switch to g711 if sip-server request g711) I have 2 SIP-services to

Is it just me or do others have a problem with the ATA-186 de-registering? Every couple of hours, if I don't make use of the ATA connected line, I find that I have to unplug and let the ATA reboot. After that it is good to go for awhile, but eventually I have to repeat the process. My ATA sits behind a NATd firewall, any ideas what might cause the de-registration? Kim C. Callis

Hi All, I have a GSM box, which needs to connect to a analogue phone line. I've plugged the GSM box to a Grandstream ATA (386). This ATA has extension number 600. Now what I want to accomplish is the following: - If a mobile-number is chosen by a user, asterisk needs to call the ATA (600), wait for a few seconds, and then send the mobile-phonenumber. Or, if it's possible, define the

Hiya, Is there any reason (and anything to worry about) if disk target IDs don''t start at 0 (zero). For some reason mine are like this (3 controllers - 1 onboard and 2 PCIe); AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c8t0d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1 cyl 19454 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci10de,cb84 at 5/disk at 0,0 1. c8t1d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1

Hello list, i am using: asterisk CVS-10/13/03-11:54:33 chan_capi-0.3.0 ATA-186 V2.16.1.ms over MGCP Situation: ISDN calls ATA ISDN speaks with ATA ATA-Phone presses Flash and speaks to another one (SIP/snom200) ATA-Phone hangs up ISDN talks to SIP/snom200 snom200 hangs up The incoming extension of ATA keeps busy for a time (20 sec?), even its not off-hook anymore! Any ideas? -- Swapping

Me again... I have service with a company that does not allow for a BYOD plan. They will not give out credential or server info either. Is it possible to run the FXS port of the ATA to an FXO port in *? The service I have is throug Broadvox Direct using the Mediatrix 2102. I have tried this using loop start and kewl start. The * box sees the incoming ring, picks up and starts my dial plan. But

Hi, Just received recently released Grandstream handytone 286 ATA for testing. I can call ATA from any other extensions and conversations seems to be of quite good quality. However placing calls from ATA is not possible at all to any extensions. After dialing there no indications of any kind from ATA at all. It just "hangs in there". ATA is behind NAT, registers to an * with public IP

...f. Do you think it should be on? > Is the ATA he is using the same as the ATA you use? No but it is the same as other users who do not have the problem. I use a SIP phone and a Cisco ATA. > Failure to correctly recognise and decode DTMF is just one of many reasons why I never use them (ATAs). Like faxing over VoIP, they're just too much trouble :( I understand but some use cases just need it. > Genuine IP phones are pretty good value these days. Could you drop one of those on-site as a temporary measure to prove that it's phone and/or ATA related? He does want to have an...

I really should be doing something better on this beautiful weekend, but I'm trying to save myself some time for later projects by documenting some things that have been particularly troublesome in the past. That being said... I've written up a configuration guide for the Cisco ATA-186, which describes some of the features that are possible to set in the ATA and specifically what

I have an analog GSM Gateway that is connected to a normal SIP ATA device. Basically what it does is this : when you call the extension nr. of the SIP ATA port, the GSM Gateway will pick up the phone and presents a (new) dial tone, and then dials whichever DTMF tones it received. The SIP ATA ia a Grandstream HT286. I would like to use the GSM Gateway to route my outbound cellular calls, how

I am looking for an ATA that has had very reliable results when passing FAX over IP. I was thinking of testing the Cisco (not Linksys) ATA 186 I1, ATA 186 I2, ATA 188 I1. This is what I'm looking for: FAX -> PTSN -> through Asterisk -> ATA -> Fax Machine. I have QoS from PSTN entry to ATA on the network so I can assure precedence. What has everyone out there been using