search for: at_entri

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "at_entri".

Did you mean: at_entry
2007 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] OCaml Install Error
On 2007-10-02, at 10:46, Jan Rehders wrote: > where can I read more about this? I assume (hope) the lib provides > some kind of OCaml bindings? I could not find any trace of it in > the 2.1 release source so I guess it's currently SVN only? Jan, Here's a trivial example. $ cat metahelloworld.ml (* metahelloworld.ml *) open Llvm open Llvm_bitwriter let _ = let filename
2007 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] Ocaml JIT example
Hi all, Here's an example of how to LLVM's JIT compiler/interpreter from Ocaml. $ cat jithelloworld.ml (* jithelloworld.ml *) open Llvm open Llvm_executionengine let execute_function f m = (* Set up the JIT. *) let jit = ExecutionEngine.create (ModuleProvider.create m) in ExecutionEngine.run_static_ctors jit; (* Execute the function. *) ignore
2007 Oct 19
0
[LLVMdev] OCaml Install Error
Hi, this looks very promising. Do you have any plans to add bindings for the use of an ExecutionEngine, especially recompileAndRelinkFunction? I've build an interactive toplevel implemented in OCaml and I have to pull of some stunts to be able to change the definition of a function. (emit a .ll file containing the code, looking up the function and calling removeBody, then reading
2007 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] OCaml Install Error
Hi, where can I read more about this? I assume (hope) the lib provides some kind of OCaml bindings? I could not find any trace of it in the 2.1 release source so I guess it's currently SVN only? greetings, Jan On 2. Okt 2007, at 12:22, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2007-10-02, at 03:19, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >> On Oct 2, 2007, at 00:17, Bill Wendling wrote: >>
2007 Oct 02
4
[LLVMdev] OCaml Install Error
On 2007-10-02, at 03:19, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On Oct 2, 2007, at 00:17, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> I get this error duing a "make install": >> >> llvm[3]: Installing Debug /usr/local/lib/ocaml/libllvm.a >> install: /usr/local/lib/ocaml/libllvm.a: Permission denied >> make[3]: *** [install-a] Error 71 >> make[2]: *** [install] Error 1
2007 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] OCaml
Jon, On 2007-11-24, at 21:58, Jon Harrop wrote: > I just took another look at the LLVM project and it has come along > in leaps and bounds since I last looked. I've been working through > the (awesome!) tutorial and am now really hyped about the project. Excellent! > I am particularly interested in using LLVM to write compilers for > OCaml-like languages in OCaml-like
2014 Jan 25
0
[klibc:master] auxv: convert auxiliary vector into an array; define getauxval()
Commit-ID: 45e09deb6a0a4fcb3a56efb7e18807b2800e358f Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=45e09deb6a0a4fcb3a56efb7e18807b2800e358f Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> AuthorDate: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:26:04 -0800 Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> CommitDate: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:28:23 -0800 auxv: convert auxiliary vector into an
2007 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] Fibonacci example in OCaml
Here's my translation of the Fibonacci example into OCaml: open Printf open Llvm let build_fib m = let fibf = define_function "fib" (function_type i32_type [| i32_type |]) m in let bb = builder_at_end (entry_block fibf) in let one = const_int i32_type 1 and two = const_int i32_type 2 in let argx = param fibf 0 in set_value_name "AnArg" argx; let
2007 Nov 25
9
[LLVMdev] OCaml
Hi! I just took another look at the LLVM project and it has come along in leaps and bounds since I last looked. I've been working through the (awesome!) tutorial and am now really hyped about the project. I am particularly interested in using LLVM to write compilers for OCaml-like languages in OCaml-like languages. This requires some core functionality that would be generically useful:
2007 Nov 25
5
[LLVMdev] OCaml
On Sunday 25 November 2007 12:23, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2007-11-24, at 21:58, Jon Harrop wrote: > > - Garbage collection tuned for functional programming > > http://llvm.org/docs/GarbageCollection.html > > I've been doing some interesting work on this front. Getting Lattner- > cycles to have it reviewed and integrated is probably the biggest > challenge; LLVM