search for: asynchronously

Hi, I have the following happen to me after the restart of one of my servers: out of my 3 PRIs (all configured with the same technical settings), the last one isn't coming back. It's underutilized (chances it didn't get a call since my reboot), if it makes a difference . The PRI goes from provisioned to unprovisioned, and I get this regularly: [Jun 22 09:03:48]

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 7/13/23 21:29, Eric Blake wrote: > > The documentation has claimed since commit 6f4dcdab that any > > completion callback will be called exactly once; but this is not > > consistent with the code: if nbd_aio_* itself returns an error, then > > nothing is queued and the user does not need to wait for a

Hi, I have installed Xen on Linux 2.6.11.10 <http://2.6.11.10> and i am trying to do Asynchronous Direct IO on SAS drives. The application which does the asynchronous direct io on SAS drive is running on Domain 0. Actually the IOPs what i get for a 512Bytes IO size is 67, but if i do the same operation on Linux 2.6.11.10 <http://2.6.11.10> native kernel, i get 267 IOPs.Cananyone

Hi, I hope someone can help me with this.... Asterisk 1.0.6 Zaptel 1.0.6 Libpri 1.0.6, 1 Digium E100P card installed Panasonic TDA200 firmware v2.0.6 E1 Card Firmware 1.0.2 System is located in Australia, so as technologies go, I believe it is twist on the euro standard for the E1 signalling. Here is the situation. The TDA E1 card is set in cross over mode and I am using a functional

Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? --------------------------------------------------------------- Summary: Need new LLVM instructions or extending of all instructions. C++ exceptions are synchronous: the compiler knows when/where they are being raised. Asynchronous exceptions can be raised at any time. For example, an integer divide-by-zero may raise an

On Jun 12, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Sohail Somani wrote: > On 11-06-12 7:40 PM, John McCall wrote: >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: >> >>>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Hi Sohail, >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous

On Jun 12, 2011, at 5:53 PM, John McCall wrote: > > On Jun 12, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Sohail Somani wrote: > >> On 11-06-12 7:40 PM, John McCall wrote: >>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: >>> >>>>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Sohail,

On 11-06-12 7:40 PM, John McCall wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > >> > On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> > >>> >> Hi Sohail, >>> >> >>>> >>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? >>> >> >>> >> not currently. The

Hi Thanks in advanced. I'm writing a proxy server doing NTLMv2 authentication. I think I need a NetLogon client service . Is there any available library providing netlogon function? or at least an dce rpc library? an asynchronous library is the best. :) Thanks again. Derek.

On 11-06-12 12:01 AM, Sohail Somani wrote: > Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Summary: Need new LLVM instructions or extending of all instructions. > > C++ exceptions are synchronous: the compiler knows when/where they are > being raised. > > Asynchronous exceptions can

On 7/14/2023 4:13 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 7/13/23 21:29, Eric Blake wrote: >>> The documentation has claimed since commit 6f4dcdab that any >>> completion callback will be called exactly once; but this is not >>> consistent with the code: if nbd_aio_* itself returns an error, then >>>

On Jun 13, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > Although I believe asynchronous signals are also best handled by the runtime. They can be converted into cooperative exceptions. I have to say I can't see the value in resuming from an interrupt at literally any instruction address. For what it's worth, SEH (which inspires a lot of this) allows blocks of code to be protected from

On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Hi Sohail, >> >>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? >> >> not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the invoke >> instruction and attach exception handling information to basic blocks. See

All, I have the following Ajax call: new Ajax.Request(action, {asynchronous: false, method: ''post'', parameters: params_to_pass, evalScripts: true}); The action that I''m calling is using render :update to send back Javascript. When asynchronous is set to true above, then the Javascript is executed (because of evalScripts:

 Hi, list,     I recently begin to study samba source code. Now I have some questions to ask. Can you give me some help?     The first question is what the relationship between samba versions(such as 3.x.x , 4.x.x) and samba3/samba4. In samba source code, I find two directories, souce3 and soure4. Do they mean  samba3 and samba4?  Actually, almost all docs in samba are about samba3, where to find

On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Sohail, > >> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? > > not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the invoke > instruction and attach exception handling information to basic blocks. See > http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExceptionHandlingChanges.txt > for a

On Jun 12, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John McCall wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> >>> Hi Sohail, >>> >>>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? >>> >>> not currently. The first step in this direction is to get rid of the

On Jun 12, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Jun 12, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John McCall wrote: > >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: >> >>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Sohail, >>>> >>>>> Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?

Hi everyone, I'm trying to get a Sangoma A101D-X card talking to a Sasktel PRI (Megalink) circuit and having some trouble getting it to handshake. Thanks for any help or suggestions to diagnose this problem. The problem is that Asterisk has trouble bringing up the link. I see the following lines every couple of minutes: == Primary D-Channel on span 1 up == Primary D-Channel on

I had one point in my project where I needed a synchronous Ajax call; in other words, I wanted the Ajax.Updater call to not return until the content of my page had been updated. However, I found that if you call Ajax.Updaterwith the {asynchronous: false} option, the onComplete() function would never be called and your content would not be updated. Was this the intended behavior? I added the