search for: astute

This is a belated heads up to let you know that I have merged DTrace to the releng7 branch in the nick of time before the feature freeze for 7.1. Those astute mailing list readers will note that the commit message appears to have gone missing. Well, either the dog ate it or subversion decided that it was for certain eyes only (and not yours, or mine). I have added a note to src/UPDATING mentioning this and a link to the documentation. I want 7.1 relea...

Hi, I''m trying to be really, really sure that a specific service is not running. The central part of this looks like that: service { ''foo'': ensure => stopped, enable => false } -> package { ''foo'': ensure => purged } The astute reader will notice that on the second run puppet will complain that the init script for foo is missing: > Error: /Stage[main]//Service[foo]: Could not evaluate: Could not find init script for ''foo'' Of course, I could either hope that removing the package will properly clean...

...ticketlock code an vCPU would only go to sleep once and > be woken up when it was its turn. With this new code it is woken up twice > (and twice it goes to sleep). With an overcommit scenario this would imply > that we will have at least twice as many VMEXIT as with the previous code. An astute observation, I had not considered that. > I presume when you did benchmarking this did not even register? Thought > I wonder if it would if you ran the benchmark for a week or so. You presume I benchmarked :-) I managed to boot something virt and run hackbench in it. I wouldn't know a r...

...ticketlock code an vCPU would only go to sleep once and > be woken up when it was its turn. With this new code it is woken up twice > (and twice it goes to sleep). With an overcommit scenario this would imply > that we will have at least twice as many VMEXIT as with the previous code. An astute observation, I had not considered that. > I presume when you did benchmarking this did not even register? Thought > I wonder if it would if you ran the benchmark for a week or so. You presume I benchmarked :-) I managed to boot something virt and run hackbench in it. I wouldn't know a r...

I'm fairly astute at C and R but new to parallelization. Would someone be willing to provide help in the form of a simple example that parallelizes an R function from the inside of a C routine? If so, write me back at izmirlig at mail.nih.gov Thanks!

...and take whatever action you like. be warned, * will probably have no idea whether your outbound call is answered by a human, an answering machine, or hits a busy signal. be further warned, i'm fairly new to * too. however, i have successfully implemented the above. hopefully one of the more astute readers will jump in if it seems like i'm leading you too far astray. ;) hope this helps, tad > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 03:41:44 +0000 > From: "Kris Edwards" <edwardskris@qwest.net> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject:...

...py or move instruction in LLVM. Recall that the text format is 1:1 with the in-memory model of the program. A copy instruction in the IR would literally mean "go look at my operand instead", leading to logic in every optimization that checks for a CopyInst and chases the pointer. The astute reader will note that I'm lying again, but it's for your own good. ;-) "%x = bitcast i32 %y to i32" is a legal way to copy, but the intention behind a BitcastInst is that it is used to change the type. Nick > because LLVM will complain that it "expected instruction opco...

...171 The fix was easy, it's just surprising to see the behavior change almost on a whim. Just wanted to point it out in case this is unknown behavior, but Evan seems to have found this as well. On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Michael Chirico <michaelchirico4 at gmail.com > wrote: > Astute observation. And of course we should be passing integer when we use > %d. It's an edge case in how we printed ITime objects in data.table: > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I initially thought this is "documen...

On 01/07/2010 06:03 PM, Alastair Lynn wrote: > > You'll probably need to use insertvalue to construct your return value. Ah ha! The fact is I didn't really understand the significance of this part when I read it, and so didn't remember it when I needed it. OK, so I have tested it and I can now build up a struct like this %s1 = insertvalue {i32, i32} {i32 0, i32 0}, i32

...tps://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5644 > > If a file exists in the target directory when using --link-dest rsync > modifies the link rather than replacing it which means you don't have > history for files that have been replaced rather than added or deleted. Thanks for your astute observation about updating hard-linked files: you had me worried for a while. Fortunately, we are using the --whole-file option in our production backups, since the target of our backups is an HSM system (SGI's DMF), and we don't want rsync to start comparing files (and thus triggering a r...

...exist on a file/directory, which does smbcacls show? What does Win* Properties-->Security show? What does smbclient show? 4) With 'inherit acls = yes' what does 'default acl' imply? All ACLs on the file/directory or just those preceded with the tag 'default'? 5) For the astute reader, since this is a Samba share, I force the group to be 'domusers' (DOMAIN\Domain Users in Win) for new files/directories. Will this always be the Linux permission group? Will this overwrite the Linux group 'users' of existing files or new files where permissions and ACLs are i...

Hi Everyone, My Xen host has 2 X 1TB hard drives in a RAID1 setup. If one DomU starts to dd a 5GB file (A ran it in a loop as a test), access ssh on the other DomU becomes very slow. Is this normal? Many Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I initially thought this is "documented behaviour". ?sprintf says: Numeric variables with __exactly integer__ values will be coerced to integer. (emphasis mine). Turns out this only works when the first value is numeric and not NA, as shown by the following example: > sprintf("%d", as.numeric(c(NA,1))) Error in sprintf("%d", as.numeric(c(NA, 1))) : invalid

Web Systems Administrator, Full-Time Full Time Position - Immediate to March 2006 start ===================== DigitalWork, a web application development company based in downtown Chicago, is seeking a technically astute, down-to-earth individual with multi-platform server administration experience. We're a small shop where each team member has significant input and influence. We have a number of exciting projects going on, including our web community, zoomshare, currently home to over 300,000 individual we...

infinity inspector come gather osmosis acme decimate idle insecure peachtree instant bessie astute von staunch beaux detonable leopard conclusive blaine missouri several defendant illinois

<disclaimer> This is really not the forum for this, but it's come up before, and I don't have an answer for it. On the other hand, this is the most astute list or newsgroup I've read pertaining to Windows networking, so here goes... </disclaimer> Using Samba 1.9.18p8, HPUX 10.20 and Win95 clients, we have W95 configured to require a domain logon, and as far as that goes it's working. We're set up on four servers, on four different...

...ould only go to sleep once and > > be woken up when it was its turn. With this new code it is woken up twice > > (and twice it goes to sleep). With an overcommit scenario this would imply > > that we will have at least twice as many VMEXIT as with the previous code. > > An astute observation, I had not considered that. Thank you. > > > I presume when you did benchmarking this did not even register? Thought > > I wonder if it would if you ran the benchmark for a week or so. > > You presume I benchmarked :-) I managed to boot something virt and run &gt...

...ould only go to sleep once and > > be woken up when it was its turn. With this new code it is woken up twice > > (and twice it goes to sleep). With an overcommit scenario this would imply > > that we will have at least twice as many VMEXIT as with the previous code. > > An astute observation, I had not considered that. Thank you. > > > I presume when you did benchmarking this did not even register? Thought > > I wonder if it would if you ran the benchmark for a week or so. > > You presume I benchmarked :-) I managed to boot something virt and run &gt...

Astute observation. And of course we should be passing integer when we use %d. It's an edge case in how we printed ITime objects in data.table: On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote: > I initially thought this is "documented behaviour". ?spri...

The Shorewall team is pleased to announce the availability of Shorewall 4.2.10. Astute users will notice that the version of Shorewall-perl included in this release is 4.2.10.1. We corrected a problem which was discovered after the release was initially uploaded, and we wanted to avoid the confusion that would inevitabley result if we were to release a different set of code with the...