Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "astbuilding".
Did you mean:
testbuilding
2016 Oct 31
2
What was the IR made for precisely?
I think it would be possible to build a stripped-down
C-with-extensions-only type representation that represents only the types
that have interesting ABI implications. This includes several things not
present in LLVM IR types: _Complex, union, flexible array members,
alignment attributes, etc. We could either then use that library to
generate LLVM IR, or embed it in the IR for use at call sites.
2016 Oct 28
4
What was the IR made for precisely?
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:21 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On 28 Oct 2016, at 02:43, ジョウェットジェームス <b3i4zz1gu1 at docomo.ne.jp> wrote:
>>
>> I would need to sum up all the rules and ABIs and sizes for all the targets I need and generate different IR for each, am I correct?
>
> This is a long-known limitation of LLVM IR and
2016 Oct 28
0
What was the IR made for precisely?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Lattner via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> To: "David Chisnall" <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>
> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org, "ジョウェットジェームス" <b3i4zz1gu1 at docomo.ne.jp>
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 2:13:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] What was the IR made for precisely?
2016 Oct 31
0
What was the IR made for precisely?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Reid Kleckner" <rnk at google.com>
> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> Cc: "Chris Lattner" <clattner at apple.com>, "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "ジョウェットジェームス"
> <b3i4zz1gu1 at docomo.ne.jp>
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 11:39:04 AM
> Subject:
2008 Mar 19
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for GSoC project for clang front end
...roject will be limited to
> C++ parsing, not code generation (I think the
> timeframe of a GSoC project and the complexity of C++ doesn't allow full
> C++ support to be developed).
Ok, remember that parsing is only one piece of the puzzle. We also have
semantic analysis/typechecking/ASTBuilding as well. I think that focusing
on -fsyntax-only is a good place to be.
> C++ parsing support includes (but is not limited to):
> -Namespace declarations, using directives.
> -Class declarations, class members, methods etc.
> -Overload method/function matching.
> -C++ name lookup r...
2008 Mar 19
5
[LLVMdev] Proposal for GSoC project for clang front end
Hi all,
I'd like to hear your opinions and ideas for a proposal to improve
support for C++ parsing for LLVM's clang front end.
Goal:
Improve clang's C++ support. The scope of the project will be limited to
C++ parsing, not code generation (I think the
timeframe of a GSoC project and the complexity of C++ doesn't allow full
C++ support to be developed).
C++ parsing support