Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "astbuild".
Did you mean:
fastbuild
2016 Oct 31
2
What was the IR made for precisely?
...times now C++) language
> constructs, I think that something like this is the best of all bad
> options. Really, however, it depends only on the AST and CodeGen, and maybe
> those (along with 'Basic', etc.) could be made into a separately-compilable
> library. Along with an easy ASTBuilder for C types and function
> declarations we should be able to satisfy this use case.
>
> -Hal
>
> >
> > -Chris
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm....
2016 Oct 28
4
What was the IR made for precisely?
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:21 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On 28 Oct 2016, at 02:43, ジョウェットジェームス <b3i4zz1gu1 at docomo.ne.jp> wrote:
>>
>> I would need to sum up all the rules and ABIs and sizes for all the targets I need and generate different IR for each, am I correct?
>
> This is a long-known limitation of LLVM IR and
2016 Oct 28
0
What was the IR made for precisely?
...terms of C (and sometimes now C++) language constructs, I think that something like this is the best of all bad options. Really, however, it depends only on the AST and CodeGen, and maybe those (along with 'Basic', etc.) could be made into a separately-compilable library. Along with an easy ASTBuilder for C types and function declarations we should be able to satisfy this use case.
-Hal
>
> -Chris
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
--...
2016 Oct 31
0
What was the IR made for precisely?
...times now C++)
> language constructs, I think that something like this is the best of
> all bad options. Really, however, it depends only on the AST and
> CodeGen, and maybe those (along with 'Basic', etc.) could be made
> into a separately-compilable library. Along with an easy ASTBuilder
> for C types and function declarations we should be able to satisfy
> this use case.
>
> -Hal
>
> >
> > -Chris
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://list...
2008 Mar 19
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for GSoC project for clang front end
...roject will be limited to
> C++ parsing, not code generation (I think the
> timeframe of a GSoC project and the complexity of C++ doesn't allow full
> C++ support to be developed).
Ok, remember that parsing is only one piece of the puzzle. We also have
semantic analysis/typechecking/ASTBuilding as well. I think that focusing
on -fsyntax-only is a good place to be.
> C++ parsing support includes (but is not limited to):
> -Namespace declarations, using directives.
> -Class declarations, class members, methods etc.
> -Overload method/function matching.
> -C++ name looku...
2008 Mar 19
5
[LLVMdev] Proposal for GSoC project for clang front end
Hi all,
I'd like to hear your opinions and ideas for a proposal to improve
support for C++ parsing for LLVM's clang front end.
Goal:
Improve clang's C++ support. The scope of the project will be limited to
C++ parsing, not code generation (I think the
timeframe of a GSoC project and the complexity of C++ doesn't allow full
C++ support to be developed).
C++ parsing support