search for: assuredly

Hi, I have a proxy/firewall, I want to dnat requests for 193.205.140.106 on port 443 towards 10.2.15.23 and requests for 193.205.140.106 on ports 4330 and 3389 towards 10.2.15.25, these rules must apply from internet, loc and fw (some client use a proxy on fw to reach these servers) I have tried with the following rules: DNAT net dmz:10.2.15.23 tcp 443 -

Hi all, I''m new to shorewall and have been struggling with several problems for several days now. Most of them are solved, but one still persists. The firewall is running on my server under Debian Sarge (Kernel 2.6) I''ve got three network interfaces: ppp0 (DSL Internet) eth1 (lan) ath0 (wlan) eth1 and ath0 are bridged together to br0. The problem is, that Samba (also running

I''m attempting to setup Squid as shown on: http://shorewall.sourceforge.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html#DMZ The firewall is a Bering 1.0 firewall running Shorewall 1.3.11, Red Hat 7.2 on the server in the DMZ. I''m not seeing the requests come in to the server using tcpdump. The server is 192.168.2.1 connecting to eth2 on the firewall, the local traffic I''m trying to

sorry, i''m confuse where to post my problem.. i was post to shorewall-users, but must read to support.html this''s my problem ----------- i have squid running on DMZ zone and my network using ProxyARP on eth1 and eth2 mylinuxbox slackware 9.2 my network can access to internet normal, but can''t redirect to squid server from firewall. sometimes my network can connect

Hi, I get frequent logfile entries from Shorewall similar to the following: Nov 25 11:22:51 10.0.0.248 kernel: Shorewall:net2mill:DROP:IN=eth2 OUT=eth0 SRC=202.96.117.50 DST=10.0.0.10 LEN=56 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=241 ID=0 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=11 CODE=0 [SRC=10.0.0.10 DST=202.101.167.133 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=13591 DF PROTO=TCP INCOMPLETE [8 bytes] ] Could someone explain what the

I have what strikes me as an odd problem with shorewall. Let me describe my setup. My desktop (alfred) is connected to the network through an ADSL modem. I am running rp-pppoe, and this works perfectly. I have a small home network, with two LANs; an Ethernet LAN (including a machine running Windows XP), and a WiFi LAN, including the laptop (william) I am using now. All the computers except for

Currently I have shorewal 2.2 installed om my debian 2.6.8 kernel. The firewall machine can access the internet via a ethernet modem fine. The firewall can ping the local network. The local network can ping the firewall server, see the samba files. Howeven teh local network cannot access the internet through the firewall Any suggestions? Rob van Overbruggen Settings and stats: Server: Eth1 :

Hi, I have followed the all the steps given, in https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ActiveDirectoryWinbindHowto. to integrate the samba with active directory. I have the following configuration file, [global] workgroup = ASSURANCE security = ads realm = ASSURANCE.LOCAL encrypt passwords = yes winbind separator = + idmap backend = lwopen idmap uid =

I apologize for the first message. :) --------------------------------------- I have an FTP server running in the DMZ section of my home network. It uses port 23000 for connection and ports 19990 to 19994 for data transfer. I have setup the following rule for outside people to connect to it: DNAT net dmz:192.168.2.2 tcp 23000 I''m at work right now and I can''t use

Hi there! I''ve using HTB for a while and now I an faced with a ''problem''. How hierarchical is HTB? Let''s say I have this 3 layer HTB setup: root class 1: (rate=100, ceil=100) 1: children classes 1:10 (30,100) and 1:20 (70,100) 1:10 children classes 1:100 (10,100) and 1:101 (20,100) 1:20 children classes 1:200 (30,100) and 1:201 (70,100) I managed to have

Dear members of the OpenSSH project, we kindly ask for your participation in our survey on security assurance in free/open source software. Security assurances are confidence building activities through structured design processes, documentation, and testing. By participating in our survey you contribute to ongoing research with the aim to make free/open source software more secure. It will

Am 2019-08-30 10:52, schrieb Gary Stainburn: > On Thursday 29 August 2019 18:10:19 Alexander Dalloz wrote: >> > 2019-08-29 17:23:18,117 exception: [Errno 14] curl#60 - "Peer's >> > Certificate issuer is not recognized." >> > 2019-08-29 17:23:18,117 retrycode (14) not in list [-1, 2, 4, 5, 6, >> > 7], re-raising >> >> [ ... ]

I have an ADSL router, a linux box with two NICS connected to the router and another PC connected to the router. I installed shorewall using the two interface method. I can ping and see the webserver on the linux box from the local network, but not from the internet. Sys info as follows: [root@wilma root]# shorewall version 1.4.6b [root@wilma root]# ip addr show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu

CISCO?s IronPort group is looking for a topnotch Software/Hardware Quality Assurance Engineer with expertise in FreeBSD. Please contact me if you are interested. Regards, Brent breroger@cisco.com Software/Hardware Quality Assurance Engineer Location ? San Bruno, California Description: Department Overview: Cisco IronPort, a part of Cisco?s Security Technologies Business Unit (STBU), email

I have problem getting answer on http request from all my local subnets but not from local subnet. Ping and requests on ports 21 22 23 25 110 works fine. I logged port 80 in rules files and I got accept entry same for local subnet and other subnets. Local subnet is 192.168.6 Dec 29 09:52:40 zinfsrv2 kernel: Shorewall:loc2fw:ACCEPT:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:09:6b:07:ca:cc:00:10:b5:fa:bd:71:08:00

(Sorry, my previous post was sent in HTML format) I am having a hell of a time with shorewall... I have a Dlink DCM202 Cable modem with the Ethernet connected directly to eth0 on the linux box. Then I have a second nic on the linux box connected to a hub for the internal network. I am trying to allow traffic from the internet connect to my FTP and WEB servers on my Winbloze box on the lan.

Am 2019-08-29 18:26, schrieb Gary Stainburn: > On Thursday 29 August 2019 16:47:11 Alexander Dalloz wrote: >> rpm -Vv nss > > [root at stan2 ~]# rpm -Vv nss > ......... /etc/pki/nss-legacy > ......... c /etc/pki/nss-legacy/nss-rhel7.config > ......... /etc/pki/nssdb > ......... c /etc/pki/nssdb/cert8.db > ......... c /etc/pki/nssdb/cert9.db > ......... c

Hi, I'm using dovecot 1.2.15 on debian squeeze with maildir, and I want to move index files out of the mailboxes disk to reduce disk I/O. I need to get the assurance that the switch is completely transparent to my clients (IMAP and POP). I read the wiki documentation and have found this thread (http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2009-September/042665.html), which makes me

The specific standards process used to develop the MPEG codecs creates patent minefields that royalty-free codecs don't generally face. Because many knowledgeable people have heard of the problems faced by these patent-soup standards, they may extrapolate these risk to codecs developed under a different process where these problems are less considerable. This is a mistake, and I'll explain

This has been an interesting discussion for me (except for the sniping). The last post led me, out of curiosity, to this wiki entry: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+TDMoE I was unaware of this feature, and it looks pretty good. I've been pondering replacing some T1's by leveraging IP capacity but of course have run up against the QoS issue. My idea was different... I