search for: assuption

I have an htb qdisc setup and it is shaping my traffic wonderfully but I''ve just recently started taking a look at the output from the command tc -s class ls dev eth? Looking at the "rate" line I thought to myself..."cool I can use this to graph throughput avg.es without having to worry about the "Sent bytes" rolling over or being lost when the htb qdisc is

...na standalone role... and using only POSIX ACLs. The relevant wiki instructions are stating: "Create the directory and set the correct permissions: # mkdir -p /srv/samba/users/ # chgrp -R "Domain Users" /srv/samba/users/ # chmod 2750 /srv/samba/users/" But there is a hidden assuption in the above that it is AD DC - "Domain Users". Or may be I should just create a linux group by that name or any other name and add all the future users to that group? In the back of my head I may consider converting this standalone srv into a Domain Member. Do you have an advice what to...

..._64 xrootd-server-devel < 5.0.0 is needed by xrootd-alicetokenacc-1:1.3.1-2.el7.x86_64 Does anyone have any idea why the condition is not fulfilled? i am aware of both http://ftp.rpm.org/api/4.4.2.2/dependencies.html and http://ftp.rpm.org/api/4.4.2.2/rpmvercmp_8c-source.html (under assuption that these holds true for the current 4.11.3 from centos 7) Thanks a lot! Adrian

...t I'm talking about. The expat parser in fact works explicitly with a 'parse-on-the-fly'. You're somewhat correct about jabber's bits of message being 'separate' documents, but see my comments way back when about packetizing the transcript format. > But maybe our assuptions aren't true. How do SOAP and XMLRPC work? > These would seem to be streaming protocols or at least similar to how > Jabber works, and I assume they are conformant to the XML spec. I don't know about SOAP, but in XMLRPC you only send one call and receive one return structure per con...

I noticed that the statically linked ogg/vorbis libraries for Windows are multithreaded. I want to link them into a non-multithreaded application, so I'm considering recompiling them to use the non-multithreaded C runtime. Is this feasible, or do libogg and libvorbis rely on multithreading? <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage:

...d be a go-between with the two file systems. Are we correct? We can find all kinds of documentation hinting at this but no documentation that spells it out for us (probably too obvious for SAMBA old-timers, but we're just going back to basics in making sure we're operating under the correct assuptions). 2) If question #1 is correct, is there any special configuration, compilation, or invokations we need to do to make SAMBA use the DCE/DFS credentials? For example, on AIX, when we want to use a DFS/DCE file share, we use this command: dce_login dfsuser abc123 (the principal is 'dfsuser...

...his particular testcase returns CNC not because the exit block doesn't have a unique predecessor, but because the unique predecessor (the inner loop block) has a successor that is inside the loop (in this case itself, because it's the inner loop block). That doesn't change, anyway, the assuption that this condition ( an exit block that jumps to a block with an unconditional jump that jumps to the loop header and that has as unique predecessor the exit block) is equivalent to jumping directly to the loop header. 2012/2/9 Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com>: > On 8 February 2012...

There is a network with windows 2008 AD DC and about 9 workstations plus some printers. The plan is to decomission the Win 2008 DC and reuse the hardware for other purposes at a later time (may be a samba AD DC, not important now). Samba Standalone is to take the role of a File and Print Server in this existing network. Questions: 1. Can Samba 4.5 "standalone" be started temporarily in

...returns CNC not because the exit block > doesn't have a unique predecessor, but because the unique predecessor > (the inner loop block) has a successor that is inside the loop (in > this case itself, because it's the inner loop block). > > That doesn't change, anyway, the assuption that this condition ( an > exit block that jumps to a block with an unconditional jump that jumps > to the loop header and that has as unique predecessor the exit block) > is equivalent to jumping directly to the loop header. > > 2012/2/9 Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com>:...

...use the exit block >> doesn't have a unique predecessor, but because the unique predecessor >> (the inner loop block) has a successor that is inside the loop (in >> this case itself, because it's the inner loop block). >> >> That doesn't change, anyway, the assuption that this condition ( an >> exit block that jumps to a block with an unconditional jump that jumps >> to the loop header and that has as unique predecessor the exit block) >> is equivalent to jumping directly to the loop header. >> >> 2012/2/9 Nick Lewycky <nlewycky...

Dear developement team, I want to share a massive storage casted with Ceph by samba with windows workstations. All works well. My problem so is that in windows the ceph storage size statistics are wrong. Instead of seeing a 44TB hard drive I see a 176GB hard drive. Under linux that issue doesn't show. The size are properly reported. I investigated around and it seems that the problem

Hello, Is there an example out there that shows how to treat each of the predictor variable types when doing logistic regression in R? Something like this: glm(y~x1+x2+x3+x4, data=mydata, family=binomial(link="logit"), na.action=na.pass) I'm drawing mostly from: http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/logit.htm ...but there are only two types of variable in the example given. I'm

All-- su cannot be run without trusting the shell. The shell cannot be trusted without trusting any instructions the shell uses, from library calls to rc scripts. Hell, the instructions the shell uses can't even be trusted, since they're all living in userspace memory. By contrast, SSHD is generally a root owned, highly secure environment with no unpriveledged userspace

That explains why there is so little information on ldb and sqlite. From my pov sqlite just seemed interesting, as it has a well known syntax and the ability to embedd a transparent logic layer. As there is no effort to use sqlite (or sql) in the future , I just burried that path. As for compability I would strongly suggest to stay where Microsoft left off, before killing the "UNIX

On 8 February 2012 15:50, Marcello Maggioni <hayarms at gmail.com> wrote: > Well, it wasn't intended as a "real" patch to be included , but more > as a "proof of concept" for a solution. Do you think it is a valid > solution and I'm correct in my assumption? If so then I'll clean up > the patch and attach a testcase for inclusion. > I'm

Well, it wasn't intended as a "real" patch to be included , but more as a "proof of concept" for a solution. Do you think it is a valid solution and I'm correct in my assumption? If so then I'll clean up the patch and attach a testcase for inclusion. Thanks! Marcello 2012/2/9 Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com>: > Your patch should include a testcase,

...omctl32: Remove another Nx1 assumption from ImageList_Remove(). comctl32: Fix an Nx1 in ImageList_DrawIndirect(). comctl32: Fix Nx1 assumptions when adding multiple bitmaps with ImageList_Add. comctl32: Check if GetObject fails on bitmaps passed to us. comctl32: Remove a Nx1 assuption in ImageList_AddMasked(). comctl32: Switch to a Nx4 tiling. riched20: Fixed memory leaks. riched20: Don't access memory after freeing it. riched20: Fix one more memory leak. riched20: Fix a leak in the undo stack. user32: ToUnicodeEx should return 0 for an un...

...primary superblock, but the alternates are never repaired to be consistent with the primary superblock - that's all fsck ever seems to do. Why does fsck not repair the alternate superblocks when it has opportunity to do so? Shouldn't fsck at least detect the inconsistency with the kernel assuptions that alternate superblocks are valid, and only the primary superblock needs to be repaired after something catastrophic occurs? Shouldn't the inconsistency be reported - at the very least? Or, shouldn't there be an option to direct fsck to fix alternate superblock inconsistency, if so de...