search for: assuaging

Dear All, discussing with a statistician of a pharmaceutical company I received this answer about the statistical package that I have planned to use: As R is not a validated software package, we would like to ask if it would rather be possible for you to use SAS, SPSS or another approved statistical software system. Could someone suggest me a 'polite' answer? TIA Giovanni -- dr.

Good morning/day/night to all! After moving all my infrastructure to Debian9, changed my ADDC from Win2K12 to Samba4 scanning my network I found the following: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- koratsuki at happyharry:~$ nmap --script smb-vuln-ms08-067.nse -p445 smb-addc.tld Starting Nmap 7.50 (

Hi all, Hobbeswalsh on IRC has discovered a backward compatibility issue in 0.24.0, preventing 0.23.x clients working well with 0.24.0 servers. Specifically, you can''t specify relationships to builtin resources when the client is 0.23.x, although specifying relationships to defined resources still works. The problem is that prior to 0.24.0 there was no central class

...ment Life Cycle. That document is available here: http://www.r-project.org/doc/R-FDA.pdf I have heard directly from colleagues in industry that this document has provided significant value in their internal discussions regarding implementing the use of R within their respective environments and assuaging many fears regarding R's use. Additionally, presentations regarding the use of open source software and R specifically for clinical trials have been made at DIA and other industry meetings. This fall, there is a session on the use of R scheduled for the FDA's Industry Statistics Workshop i...

I have Samba 2.2.3a running on Tru64 Unix v4.0f (?) I have Win NT4.0 (sp6a) as our local PC OS. I have created a Samba password file for users. I've tried several permutations, but currently I have security = user encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = yes username map = /../../../usermap.txt I also have standard password encryption on the NT side, i.e. not plaintext. If I sync

On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 09:14 -0400, Leslie León via samba wrote: > Good morning/day/night to all! > > After moving all my infrastructure to Debian9, changed my ADDC from > Win2K12 to Samba4 scanning my network I found the following: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >

I posted a while back about having trouble with ices 0.2.2 being able to re-encode VBR mp3s, and the response was that ices 0.2.2 did not reencode VBR mp3s. Are there any plans to include such support in future ices versions? If so, any ideas as to when such versions would become available? Thanks, -- "Shall life renew these bodies of a truth? Steve Chadsey All death will

Hi, In http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01155.html, I noted that the often-observed hangs of rsync under Cygwin were assuaged by a call to msleep(). After upgrading my Cygwin environment to rsync 2.5.6, I'm seeing these hangs again, not surprisingly given a CVS entry for main.c notes that this kludge was not harmless: Revision 1.162 / (download) - annotate - [select for

I just got a Diffusion notification about a change of mine being reverted by Fangrui, but I'm not sure that's actually what happened and am confused and concerned. My commit was "[DebugInfo] Allow spill slots in call site parameter descriptions", and it appears in the history under two hashes: 1ee84e and 67c416. The first commit contains the actual change. The second touches

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > However, everyone seems to think I'm advocating we never move the CMake > > version forward. That isn't what I'm saying at all. What I am saying is > that > > moving the CMake version forward has a cost. Not a huge insurmountable > cost, > > but non-zero

Well, I see that my last email hasn''t generated any reaction from the Rails core team. It looks like all of them are the happy users of "plain text" (which, as we know by now, doesn''t exist, but still). I apologize in advance for the sore bitterness of this message but I see that the Rails-core STILL, despite all of the efforts, sees these issues as something

I've taken the liberty of starting a new thread to discuss the design of the Asterisk CDR mechanism. The discussion has been kindly initiated by murf putting together a proposal: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/murf/RFCs. After reading the proposal I still don't think it's the right way to go. To my mind adding more channel variables increases the complexity in a situation

Fedora Core 7 has just updated their Ruby package (was 1.8.6.36-3.fc7, is now 1.8.6.110-3.fc7), and the upgrade broke my Puppet installation, and there was a similar report from someone else. Communications between the puppetmasterd and the puppetd running on the same host broke down with the message: Could not retrieve configuration: Certificates were not trusted: hostname not match with

Hi All I am really very interested in starting to use R within our company. I particularly like the open source nature of the product. My company is a medical research company which is part of the University of London. We conduct contract virology research for large pharma companies. My question is how do we validate this software? I wonder if anyone else has had the problem and might be able to

Suppose we have a method ''foo'' which internally uses another method ''bar''. Being good BDDers we mock out the ''bar'' method. After all, we only want to spec the ''foo'' method - actually running the ''bar'' method means slower, less maintainable and brittler specs. That''s why we <3 mocking,